Tools & Wizards About Us
laurelhedging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

laurelhedging.com

Laurel Hedging - A Complete Guide to Laurel Hedging

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

607 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

242 ms

laurelhedging.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Laurel Hedging content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laurelhedging.com

Welcome to our website on Laurel Hedging. On this site you can buy Laurel or find information about different types of Laurel and their Care, Maintenance and Botany.

Visit laurelhedging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Laurelhedging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 607 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laurelhedging.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.laurelhedging.com

607 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

80 ms

dashicons.min.css

237 ms

extra.min.css

231 ms

front.min.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Laurelhedging.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) belongs to the original domain Laurelhedging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.3 kB (12%)

Content Size

945.0 kB

After Optimization

833.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Laurelhedging.com main page is 945.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 667.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 67.9 kB

  • Original 667.7 kB
  • After minification 599.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laurel Hedging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 138.1 kB
  • After minification 138.1 kB
  • After compression 131.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 101.2 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 94.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laurelhedging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (64%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laurel Hedging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.laurelhedging.com

www.laurelhedging.com

607 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

80 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

237 ms

extra.min.css

extra.min.css

231 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

241 ms

icons.css

icons.css

237 ms

wp_head.css

wp_head.css

239 ms

style.dev.css

style.dev.css

402 ms

style.css

style.css

307 ms

css

css

35 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

314 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

317 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

397 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

320 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

383 ms

et-core-unified-17036791719377.min.css

et-core-unified-17036791719377.min.css

392 ms

js

js

67 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

396 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

398 ms

custom.js

custom.js

465 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

495 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

496 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

497 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

610 ms

common.js

common.js

499 ms

wp_footer.js

wp_footer.js

540 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

559 ms

hom7vcd.js

hom7vcd.js

252 ms

head-bg.jpg

head-bg.jpg

119 ms

laurel-logo.png

laurel-logo.png

174 ms

menu-bg.jpg

menu-bg.jpg

175 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

476 ms

types-slider.jpg

types-slider.jpg

286 ms

green-button-arrow.png

green-button-arrow.png

211 ms

hedging-care-slider.jpg

hedging-care-slider.jpg

285 ms

faqs-slider.jpg

faqs-slider.jpg

212 ms

botany-slide.jpg

botany-slide.jpg

220 ms

homepage-benefits-image.jpg

homepage-benefits-image.jpg

354 ms

leaf-bullet.png

leaf-bullet.png

285 ms

homepage-living-image.jpg

homepage-living-image.jpg

459 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

51 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

57 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

62 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

83 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

84 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

386 ms

js

js

51 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

d

d

143 ms

d

d

245 ms

d

d

310 ms

d

d

158 ms

Accessibility Review

laurelhedging.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

laurelhedging.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

laurelhedging.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laurelhedging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laurelhedging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

laurelhedging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laurel Hedging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: