5.2 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.5 sec
218 ms
Visit lawstory.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Lawstory content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lawstory.co.uk
Lawstory - a story about lawyers and law firmsWho gets involved, why they get excited and frustrated, how and why they get things right and sometimes wrong.
Visit lawstory.co.ukWe analyzed Lawstory.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lawstory.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.15
76/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
1435 ms
69 ms
89 ms
249 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Lawstory.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lawstory.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 641.6 kB (32%)
2.0 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Lawstory.co.uk main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 556.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lawstory needs image optimization as it can save up to 556.8 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lawstory.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (63%)
54
20
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lawstory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lawstory.co.uk
1435 ms
js
69 ms
MyFontsWebfontsKit.css
89 ms
jquery.min.js
249 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
224 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
258 ms
bootstrap.min.js
261 ms
modernizr.custom.js
261 ms
combined.min.js
260 ms
bootstrap.min.css
374 ms
font-awesome.min.css
332 ms
combined.min.css
401 ms
animate.css
330 ms
css
39 ms
style.css
337 ms
styles-responsive.css
339 ms
styles.css
406 ms
twitterdisplay.css
409 ms
menu.min.css
416 ms
menu.fix.css
417 ms
bootstrap.min.css
450 ms
caption.js
486 ms
core.js
487 ms
keepalive.js
494 ms
bootstrap.min.js
494 ms
ext-core.js
527 ms
menu.min.js
567 ms
custom.css
570 ms
n2-ss-2.css
572 ms
n2.js
650 ms
nextend-gsap.min.js
661 ms
nextend-frontend.min.js
603 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
725 ms
smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js
660 ms
slidebars.min.js
659 ms
js
48 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
collect
29 ms
ScreenShot2017-03-10at085155.png
775 ms
ScreenShot2017-03-10at085047.png
786 ms
ScreenShot2017-03-10at085121.png
812 ms
PractisingBanner.jpg
215 ms
lawstory-logo-main.png
155 ms
business-partnership-home-box.jpg
288 ms
a-merger-images.jpg
378 ms
mindfulness-banner-home-box.jpg
155 ms
smart-man-web.png
427 ms
twitter-icon.png
213 ms
linkedin-icon.png
219 ms
ISLP_banner.jpg
376 ms
icon_active.png
295 ms
menu-arrow-down.png
278 ms
menu-arrow-right.png
360 ms
bucket-button.png
359 ms
footer-nav-bg.jpg
360 ms
2B9AA9_0_0.woff
436 ms
font
134 ms
2B9AA9_1_0.woff
409 ms
lawstory.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lawstory.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lawstory.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lawstory.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lawstory.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lawstory.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lawstory. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: