642 ms in total
104 ms
460 ms
78 ms
Visit lbackup.org now to see the best up-to-date LBackup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lbackup.org
Open Source Backup Softwareoverview
Visit lbackup.orgWe analyzed Lbackup.org page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 538 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
lbackup.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value280 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
104 ms
198 ms
19 ms
53 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Lbackup.org, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (198 ms) belongs to the original domain Lbackup.org.
Page size can be reduced by 20.3 kB (21%)
96.8 kB
76.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lbackup.org main page is 96.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 39.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LBackup needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 187 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lbackup.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)
18
10
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LBackup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lbackup.org
104 ms
www.lbackup.org
198 ms
css.php
19 ms
jquery.php
53 ms
js.php
36 ms
layout.css
22 ms
design.css
22 ms
topbar.css
23 ms
sidebar.css
25 ms
translation_plugin.css
26 ms
ga.js
8 ms
forkme_right_gray.png
8 ms
twitter_logo_medium.png
34 ms
strong_elephant.png
37 ms
golden_safe.jpg
36 ms
overview_open_source_v2.png
35 ms
overview_gnu_gpl_v3.png
34 ms
indexer.php
36 ms
plusone.js
23 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
lbackup.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lbackup.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lbackup.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lbackup.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lbackup.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lbackup.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LBackup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: