Tools & Wizards About Us
led.wf screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

led.wf

led.wf

Page Load Speed

994 ms in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

580 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

led.wf screenshot

About Website

Welcome to led.wf homepage info - get ready to check Led best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about led.wf

This domain may be for sale!

Visit led.wf

Key Findings

We analyzed Led.wf page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 697 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

led.wf performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

led.wf

297 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Led.wf and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (297 ms) belongs to the original domain Led.wf.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.3 kB (65%)

Content Size

97.5 kB

After Optimization

34.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Led.wf main page is 97.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 95.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 979 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 764 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 979 B or 56% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 62.3 kB

  • Original 95.8 kB
  • After minification 95.8 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Led. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

led.wf

led.wf

297 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

251 ms

Accessibility Review

led.wf accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

led.wf best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

led.wf SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Led.wf can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Led.wf main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

led.wf

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Led. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: