3.1 sec in total
300 ms
2.7 sec
124 ms
Visit leggett-cpu.com now to see the best up-to-date Leggett Cpu content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leggett-cpu.com
Visit leggett-cpu.comWe analyzed Leggett-cpu.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
leggett-cpu.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
300 ms
100 ms
64 ms
91 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Leggett-cpu.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Fashionbedgroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 218.0 kB (25%)
855.1 kB
637.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Leggett-cpu.com main page is 855.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 535.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leggett Cpu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 178.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leggett-cpu.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (69%)
32
10
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leggett Cpu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fashionbedgroup.com
300 ms
reset.css
100 ms
dropdown.css
64 ms
shadowbox.css
91 ms
style.css
281 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
1535 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
121 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
149 ms
shadowbox.js
1379 ms
typeface-0.15.js
524 ms
tradegothic_lt_bold_regular.typeface.js
1596 ms
default.js
485 ms
slideshow.css
503 ms
home.css
723 ms
css
25 ms
slideshow.js
706 ms
logo.png
65 ms
drop_down_arrow.gif
46 ms
fashion_bed.jpg
217 ms
bases.jpg
212 ms
home_collection.jpg
123 ms
bed-frames.jpg
93 ms
splashtext-background.png
74 ms
redbutton-right.png
93 ms
redbutton-left.png
119 ms
controls-background.png
127 ms
prev.gif
127 ms
playpause.gif
151 ms
next.gif
159 ms
videolibrarylink.jpg
201 ms
ecologow.jpg
213 ms
ga.js
23 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
18 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
18 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
19 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
leggett-cpu.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
leggett-cpu.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
leggett-cpu.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leggett-cpu.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leggett-cpu.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leggett-cpu.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Leggett Cpu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: