14.3 sec in total
456 ms
13.4 sec
472 ms
Welcome to leisuretravelreports.com homepage info - get ready to check Leisuretravelreports best content right away, or after learning these important things about leisuretravelreports.com
Truth In Travel
Visit leisuretravelreports.comWe analyzed Leisuretravelreports.com page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 13.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
leisuretravelreports.com performance score
456 ms
103 ms
173 ms
221 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Leisuretravelreports.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Leisuretravelreports.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.1 kB (28%)
937.9 kB
676.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Leisuretravelreports.com main page is 937.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 642.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leisuretravelreports images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leisuretravelreports.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (52%)
87
42
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leisuretravelreports. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
leisuretravelreports.com
456 ms
style.css
103 ms
fab_style.css
173 ms
styles.css
221 ms
postratings-css.css
202 ms
easy-twitter-feed-widget.css
170 ms
style.css
183 ms
jetpack.css
212 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
swfobject.js
286 ms
gmedia.global.front.js
372 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
288 ms
photon.js
316 ms
jquery.form.min.js
299 ms
scripts.js
374 ms
postratings-js.js
374 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
widget-easy-twitter-feed-widget.js
412 ms
wp-embed.min.js
490 ms
e-201605.js
11 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
350 ms
ga.js
6 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
widgets.js
28 ms
bg.jpg
134 ms
header-bg.jpg
136 ms
header-mailbg.png
689 ms
logo-bg.png
129 ms
logo-bgl.png
180 ms
logo-bgr.png
436 ms
2014Seal_Finalist.png
1107 ms
MembersLogo.jpg
740 ms
photogallerycreator.com.png
802 ms
codeasily.com.png
801 ms
featured-bg.jpg
682 ms
content-bg.jpg
734 ms
content-top.png
1183 ms
box-t.gif
814 ms
box-b.gif
814 ms
box-r.gif
807 ms
box-l.gif
806 ms
box-rb.gif
893 ms
box-lb.gif
899 ms
box-rt.gif
893 ms
box-lt.gif
901 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
hr.gif
927 ms
wordpress.png
947 ms
rating_over.gif
981 ms
all.js
313 ms
g.gif
21 ms
fa67c46eb36541957dc49b1fa7026876
859 ms
dcaad3e2b29320d871a8760a723432ed
938 ms
7b23ea81597a44f4334693411691a4a5
972 ms
c1e75a5826b5f35544b786d6bd8f43f7
947 ms
60487584c3ea72bb774b89952d665fd0
1005 ms
141 ms
xd_arbiter.php
135 ms
xd_arbiter.php
259 ms
654157808565184bff64fbc11bf72390
849 ms
1b3905e80d5eeefbb868ae56efad80e4
765 ms
a6970f2d9e3c28f916b03b1ca320aa39
833 ms
851a2c6b3c0e484be048f7f9e2c47d3a
806 ms
c5dc4e43da4a45221e5c9d0befc71a23
826 ms
5aabe178002121eefe06afca4039068a
936 ms
17d854b2ae3f3b2607b6df61f528aed0
448 ms
b1b1c2f38802f707a243faadfc45d1f0
411 ms
9bc21c4cccf1038cccf7faaf99ffc110
441 ms
5e7b4756a00dfc8566e56ddc043ff9bb
449 ms
484716f9cb345735c2c6b003ec76d53a
416 ms
febf5946fe15be5cdf471c62697c9f23
396 ms
25d65b3001d61eff03ccaf79db1d06de
107 ms
9358cd38f38ee6a78b94a7028be1051b
175 ms
8eff8ed4742c6fdaa079c7438b09a79f
182 ms
ping
60 ms
send.php
108 ms
like.php
127 ms
send.php
162 ms
like.php
162 ms
send.php
191 ms
like.php
174 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
330 ms
bz5aiOJLD9D.png
253 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
320 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
183 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
292 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
271 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
264 ms
leisuretravelreports.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leisuretravelreports.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leisuretravelreports.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leisuretravelreports.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Leisuretravelreports. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: