Tools & Wizards About Us
lena.lu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

lena.lu

Lena | Second Hand Shop

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

305 ms

lena.lu screenshot

About Website

Visit lena.lu now to see the best up-to-date Lena content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lena.lu

Visit lena.lu

Key Findings

We analyzed Lena.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lena.lu performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lena.lu

2348 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

263 ms

css

28 ms

reset-bootstrap.css

526 ms

style.css

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Lena.lu, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lena.lu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 627.8 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

553.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lena.lu main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 441.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 388.2 kB
  • After minification 385.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lena images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 229.7 kB

  • Original 330.0 kB
  • After minification 319.5 kB
  • After compression 100.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 378.8 kB

  • Original 441.8 kB
  • After minification 362.1 kB
  • After compression 63.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lena.lu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 378.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (89%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lena. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lena.lu

lena.lu

2348 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

263 ms

css

css

28 ms

reset-bootstrap.css

reset-bootstrap.css

526 ms

style.css

style.css

350 ms

style.css

style.css

177 ms

style.css

style.css

537 ms

style.css

style.css

236 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

352 ms

jquery.selectBox.css

jquery.selectBox.css

410 ms

wishlist.css

wishlist.css

433 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

660 ms

custom.css

custom.css

777 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

912 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

742 ms

jquery.commonlibraries.js

jquery.commonlibraries.js

951 ms

jquery.layout.js

jquery.layout.js

691 ms

jquery.custom.js

jquery.custom.js

776 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

905 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

905 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

906 ms

jq-cookie.js

jq-cookie.js

958 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

1035 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

1125 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.init.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.init.min.js

1038 ms

jquery.selectBox.min.js

jquery.selectBox.min.js

1158 ms

jquery.yith-wcwl.js

jquery.yith-wcwl.js

1123 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

1120 ms

twitter-text.js

twitter-text.js

1290 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

1207 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

1299 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

1300 ms

woocommerce_2.3.js

woocommerce_2.3.js

1300 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

1326 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1381 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

1191 ms

logo_maintenance.jpg

logo_maintenance.jpg

581 ms

WhvNfO27lzODDhoAPcYEXQ.ttf

WhvNfO27lzODDhoAPcYEXQ.ttf

11 ms

Accessibility Review

lena.lu accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lena.lu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lena.lu SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lena.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lena.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lena.lu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lena. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: