5.8 sec in total
201 ms
4.8 sec
796 ms
Visit lepide.com now to see the best up-to-date Lepide content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lepide.com
Combine identity and data security into a single solution for powerful data protection, threat detection/response, and compliance reporting.
Visit lepide.comWe analyzed Lepide.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
lepide.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
201 ms
566 ms
320 ms
438 ms
448 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Lepide.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Image.providesupport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 630.5 kB (30%)
2.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Lepide.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lepide images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 270.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 270.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lepide.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (23%)
60
46
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lepide. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lepide.com
201 ms
www.lepide.com
566 ms
style.css
320 ms
dashboard.jpg
438 ms
adhealth.jpg
448 ms
delegation.jpg
438 ms
granular.jpg
446 ms
rollback.jpg
428 ms
exchange-migration-dashboard.png
552 ms
6.Viewing_Large_Report.jpg
560 ms
PreMigrationAnalysis.jpg
504 ms
SelOptforBadtmndSyncDir.jpg
504 ms
01.jpg
581 ms
02.jpg
606 ms
03.jpg
693 ms
04.jpg
633 ms
05.jpg
679 ms
rerox.png
623 ms
hp.png
643 ms
cisco.png
670 ms
capgemini.png
687 ms
client7.gif
696 ms
client5.gif
711 ms
img4.png
738 ms
img6.png
740 ms
img5.png
753 ms
microsoft-p.png
757 ms
facebook.png
762 ms
twiter.png
777 ms
linkedin.png
805 ms
googleplus.png
806 ms
youtube.png
818 ms
spiceworks.png
819 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
jquery.js
785 ms
bootstrap.js
800 ms
owl.carousel.js
830 ms
scroller.js
828 ms
global-jquery.js
831 ms
css
65 ms
font-awesome.css
621 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
539 ms
bootstrap.min.css
553 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
575 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
569 ms
bannernew1.jpg
98 ms
bannernew2.jpg
223 ms
bannernew3.jpg
223 ms
shadow2.png
97 ms
date.png
97 ms
top-arrow.png
96 ms
logo.png
222 ms
safe-standard.js
3052 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
177 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
214 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
242 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
262 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
262 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
212 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
155 ms
16022
334 ms
improvely.js
177 ms
collect
105 ms
collect
199 ms
prev.png
92 ms
next.png
91 ms
laptop.png
204 ms
98 ms
ga-audiences
21 ms
16022
147 ms
lepide.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lepide.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lepide.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lepide.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lepide.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lepide.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lepide. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: