2 sec in total
325 ms
1.4 sec
299 ms
Click here to check amazing Lexap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lexap.com
Visit lexap.comWe analyzed Lexap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lexap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
325 ms
28 ms
94 ms
149 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Lexap.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) belongs to the original domain Lexap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 498.9 kB (41%)
1.2 MB
732.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lexap.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 643.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.3 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lexap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 297.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 297.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lexap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (30%)
56
39
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lexap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lexap.com
325 ms
css
28 ms
jquery.sidr.light.css
94 ms
animate.min.css
149 ms
md-slider.css
159 ms
style.css
177 ms
responsive.css
173 ms
raphael-min.js
275 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
284 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
220 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
234 ms
md_slider.min.js
257 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
259 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
299 ms
pie.js
311 ms
script.js
343 ms
cart.js
342 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js
379 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
380 ms
logo.png
157 ms
banner1.jpg
312 ms
banner-bg2.jpg
169 ms
banner2-img.png
249 ms
way7-img.jpg
154 ms
packeg-img.jpg
155 ms
25767product-img1.jpg
196 ms
27988product-img3.jpg
212 ms
7144product-img5.jpg
216 ms
17896product-img6.jpg
252 ms
16897product-img7.jpg
283 ms
9217product-img8.jpg
303 ms
21757product-img9.jpg
287 ms
11471product-img10.jpg
330 ms
16492product-img11.jpg
346 ms
21158product-img12.jpg
370 ms
Kenny%20Andam%20119x119.jpg
430 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img2.jpg
393 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img3.jpg
388 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img4.jpg
413 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img5.jpg
428 ms
Jarle%20Thorsen%202%20119x119.jpg
545 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img7.jpg
467 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img8.jpg
484 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img9.jpg
496 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img10.jpg
513 ms
Abe%20Cofnas%202%20119x119.jpg
499 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img6.jpg
546 ms
Kjell%20Arild%20Tiltnes%20119x119.jpg
575 ms
Roar%20Hvalstad%20119x119.jpg
579 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img.jpg
570 ms
lexap-ambassadors-Img11.jpg
596 ms
logo-2.png
630 ms
Offer.jpg
688 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
53 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
53 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
55 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
53 ms
icon.png
634 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
md-arrow.png
513 ms
next-prev-icon.png
533 ms
lexap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lexap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lexap.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lexap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lexap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lexap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lexap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: