3.2 sec in total
136 ms
2.7 sec
372 ms
Visit lexingtonclinic.com now to see the best up-to-date Lexington Clinic content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lexingtonclinic.com
Visit lexingtonclinic.comWe analyzed Lexingtonclinic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lexingtonclinic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.837
4/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
136 ms
384 ms
32 ms
96 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Lexingtonclinic.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lexingtonclinic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (60%)
2.1 MB
846.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Lexingtonclinic.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 906.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.5 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lexington Clinic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 658.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 658.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 570.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lexingtonclinic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 570.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (78%)
73
16
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lexington Clinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lexingtonclinic.com
136 ms
www.lexingtonclinic.com
384 ms
video-js.css
32 ms
bootstrap.min.css
96 ms
style.css
82 ms
line-icons.css
88 ms
font-awesome.min.css
92 ms
flexslider.css
89 ms
parallax-slider.css
90 ms
owl.carousel.css
109 ms
sky-forms.css
110 ms
perfect-scrollbar.css
115 ms
default.css
113 ms
profile.css
111 ms
feature_timeline1.css
121 ms
custom.css
133 ms
page_log_reg_v1.css
134 ms
bootstrap-ie7.css
137 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
167 ms
api.js
35 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
137 ms
ui.style.css
184 ms
settings.css
158 ms
bootstrap.min.js
159 ms
custom.js
159 ms
video.js
218 ms
revolution-slider.js
182 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
212 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.js
242 ms
index.js
190 ms
owl-carousel.js
206 ms
back-to-top.js
211 ms
owl.carousel.js
218 ms
app.js
230 ms
perfect-scrollbar.js
237 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
239 ms
modernizr.js
245 ms
mediaQueries.js
245 ms
app.css
188 ms
ie8.css
194 ms
css
63 ms
blocks.css
196 ms
plugins.css
190 ms
animate.css
196 ms
box-shadows.css
191 ms
style-switcher.css
201 ms
header-default.css
192 ms
header-v1.css
197 ms
header-v2.css
198 ms
header-v3.css
198 ms
header-v4.css
200 ms
footer-default.css
205 ms
footer-v1.css
201 ms
footer-v2.css
197 ms
footer-v3.css
204 ms
footer-v4.css
199 ms
footer-v5.css
199 ms
footer-v6.css
182 ms
footer-v7.css
185 ms
analytics.js
142 ms
lc_logo.png
222 ms
17042.jpg
1735 ms
17021.jpg
1651 ms
17044.jpg
1567 ms
16987.jpg
1760 ms
17046.jpg
1818 ms
lc-patient-portal.jpg
349 ms
lc_logo_white.png
380 ms
recaptcha__en.js
221 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
122 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
122 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
321 ms
collect
22 ms
loader.gif
250 ms
timer.png
279 ms
bullet.png
309 ms
large_left.png
338 ms
large_right.png
367 ms
lexingtonclinic.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lexingtonclinic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lexingtonclinic.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lexingtonclinic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lexingtonclinic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lexingtonclinic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lexington Clinic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: