1.4 sec in total
201 ms
1 sec
176 ms
Click here to check amazing Libcom content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about libcom.org
Visit libcom.orgWe analyzed Libcom.org page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
libcom.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.188
65/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
201 ms
90 ms
255 ms
87 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Libcom.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (441 ms) belongs to the original domain Libcom.org.
Page size can be reduced by 163.7 kB (41%)
399.6 kB
235.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Libcom.org main page is 399.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 189.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Libcom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Libcom.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (22%)
27
21
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Libcom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
libcom.org
201 ms
css_d41aa5c81aa3b48487ed29aa82fe3d7f.css
90 ms
js_39ce52058f397712f634ae7c612d04c7.js
255 ms
feed.png
87 ms
228317.jpg
86 ms
Philadelphia-Panthers.jpg
174 ms
english-neo-nazis-were-humiliated-in-liverpool-this-weekend-943-body-image-1439805035-size_1000.jpg
206 ms
Screen%20Shot%202016-02-24%20at%209.30.29%20AM.png
273 ms
books_0.jpg
417 ms
montgomery-bus-boycott.jpg
441 ms
libcom-organise.jpg
273 ms
la-riots.jpg
233 ms
poster-1931h%5B1%5D.jpg
231 ms
Jeremy-Brecher.jpg
270 ms
quotemark.png
271 ms
all.js
169 ms
follow_button.html
102 ms
semiblack.png
313 ms
ga.js
383 ms
plusone.js
169 ms
widgets.js
115 ms
jot
134 ms
info.json
159 ms
164 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
28 ms
xd_arbiter.php
137 ms
xd_arbiter.php
263 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
libcom.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
libcom.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
libcom.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Libcom.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Libcom.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
libcom.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Libcom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: