Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

lidl.lt

LIDL Lietuva - www.lidl.lt

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

996 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

lidl.lt screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lidl.lt homepage info - get ready to check LIDL best content for Lithuania right away, or after learning these important things about lidl.lt

Kviečiame peržiūrėti aktualius kainų leidinius, pasiūlymus ir akcijas. Maisto prekių pasiūlymai ir naujos ne maisto prekės kiekvieną savaitę.

Visit lidl.lt

Key Findings

We analyzed Lidl.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 996 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lidl.lt performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,070 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.144

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.htm

996 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

221 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

117 ms

screen.css

357 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lidl.lt, 4% (3 requests) were made to Etracker.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ecn.dev.virtualearth.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Karjera.lidl.lt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (47%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Lidl.lt main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 92.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LIDL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 920.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 995.2 kB
  • After compression 327.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 920.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 375.2 kB

  • Original 446.1 kB
  • After minification 330.8 kB
  • After compression 70.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lidl.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 375.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (79%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LIDL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lidl.lt accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lidl.lt best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lidl.lt SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LT

  • Language Claimed

    LT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lidl.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lidl.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LIDL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: