5 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.9 sec
569 ms
Visit life-beam.com now to see the best up-to-date Life Beam content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about life-beam.com
Visit life-beam.comWe analyzed Life-beam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
life-beam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.576
12/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
1517 ms
340 ms
28 ms
19 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Life-beam.com, 45% (50 requests) were made to Firstzone.lifebeamtechnolo.netdna-cdn.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Life-beam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (53%)
3.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Life-beam.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 607.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 607.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Beam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Life-beam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (82%)
88
16
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Beam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
life-beam.com
1517 ms
1763181693.js
340 ms
css
28 ms
css
19 ms
jquery.js
82 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
78 ms
greensock.js
78 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
74 ms
ts-fab.min.js
75 ms
scripts-frontend.js
80 ms
gtm4wp-outbound-click-tracker.js
83 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
83 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
82 ms
gtm4wp-social-tracker.js
86 ms
headerScript.js
86 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
15 ms
mystyle.css
86 ms
mailchimp.js
86 ms
jQuery-min.js
90 ms
jquery.form.min.js
85 ms
scripts.js
88 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
89 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
86 ms
woocommerce.min.js
95 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
96 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
95 ms
woo-featured-video.js
94 ms
qode-like.js
95 ms
plugins.js
107 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
98 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
97 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
95 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
95 ms
default_dynamic.js
97 ms
default.min.js
105 ms
comment-reply.min.js
105 ms
js_composer_front.js
102 ms
woocommerce.js
102 ms
select2.min.js
104 ms
custom.js
105 ms
yikes-mc-ajax-forms.js
47 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
style.css
7 ms
widget.js
77 ms
lifebeam-logo1.png
42 ms
LB-Shop_0000_helmet-side-90x66.png
43 ms
LB-Shop_0004_hat-side-white-90x66.png
44 ms
LB-Shop_0009_visor-side-90x66.png
44 ms
Ray-coverImage1-runner.jpg
48 ms
Ray-coverImage2-swimmer.jpg
44 ms
Ray-coverImage3-cyclist2.jpg
48 ms
hp-rayPlatform-symbolic-3-300x300.png
44 ms
hp-lifebeam-gear-helmet-4-300x300.png
45 ms
hp-lifebeam-aerospace-4-300x3001.png
46 ms
gtm.js
111 ms
header_shopping_bag.png
29 ms
lifebeam-hexbg5.jpg
30 ms
widget.css
94 ms
3982.js
277 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcYxZwi1wmHdibB-7vcrwmEM.ttf
32 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr7T7MrtsDVmPQXgBvjkmLm0.ttf
39 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr7IYouiQL7L631KiOQBZVrs.ttf
83 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr3wGOC5HDunjaHPK3sR-CSA.ttf
84 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprz8H8-k4-wOkRlhwLTZ2Z3M.ttf
82 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
228 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
97 ms
fbevents.js
213 ms
roundtrip.js
12 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
conversion.js
30 ms
oct.js
207 ms
ec.js
169 ms
widgets.js
150 ms
logo.png
202 ms
i
13 ms
batch
144 ms
I5E7L33PRBBP3IW37IGNZ4.js
238 ms
collect
46 ms
26 ms
adsct
135 ms
adsct
82 ms
35 ms
81 ms
87 ms
88 ms
collect
111 ms
sign_in_url
24 ms
logo.png
60 ms
ga-audiences
40 ms
out
6 ms
tr
7 ms
26 ms
49 ms
tr
6 ms
out
18 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
22 ms
out
21 ms
out
21 ms
u.php
54 ms
sync
29 ms
adsct
42 ms
pixel
76 ms
28 ms
32 ms
sd
23 ms
377928.gif
22 ms
pixel
18 ms
in
21 ms
life-beam.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
life-beam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
life-beam.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Life-beam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Life-beam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
life-beam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Beam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: