Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

life-gp.net

LIFE GOES TO A PARTY

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

115 ms

life-gp.net screenshot

About Website

Visit life-gp.net now to see the best up-to-date LIFE Gp content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about life-gp.net

LGTブログはPC・Mac・iPhone等の設定、試した機能、やっている事、思っている事をつづるブログです。

Visit life-gp.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Life-gp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

life-gp.net performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

life-gp.net

190 ms

www.life-gp.net

427 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

80 ms

authorization.css

124 ms

show_ads.js

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Life-gp.net, 10% (9 requests) were made to 1.bp.blogspot.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Is4.mzstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 175.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Life-gp.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 893.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 10 B

  • Original 108 B
  • After minification 108 B
  • After compression 98 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 96.4 kB

  • Original 893.1 kB
  • After minification 796.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LIFE Gp needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 69.6 kB

  • Original 274.3 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB
  • After compression 204.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Life-gp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (41%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LIFE Gp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

life-gp.net accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

life-gp.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

life-gp.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Life-gp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Life-gp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LIFE Gp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: