Tools & Wizards About Us
lifecell.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lifecell.in

Best Stem Cell Bank in India: Sexual Health Care and Stem Cell Banking Services - Lifecell

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

658 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

lifecell.in screenshot

About Website

Visit lifecell.in now to see the best up-to-date Lifecell content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifecell.in

Lifecell offers trusted stem cell banking in India, specializing in comprehensive prenatal and newborn diagnostic services, including stem cell preservation.

Visit lifecell.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifecell.in page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifecell.in performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,870 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifecell.in

658 ms

www.lifecell.in

1230 ms

Tracker.js

75 ms

8c44def6e387d530.css

409 ms

7f47b9549bf34fb2.css

566 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Lifecell.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Web-in21.mxradon.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifecell.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.8 kB (31%)

Content Size

234.8 kB

After Optimization

162.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lifecell.in main page is 234.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 150.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 68.8 kB

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 147.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifecell images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (40%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifecell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifecell.in

lifecell.in

658 ms

www.lifecell.in

www.lifecell.in

1230 ms

Tracker.js

Tracker.js

75 ms

8c44def6e387d530.css

8c44def6e387d530.css

409 ms

7f47b9549bf34fb2.css

7f47b9549bf34fb2.css

566 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

760 ms

js

js

68 ms

6066-54896c5ec08bbffb.js

6066-54896c5ec08bbffb.js

815 ms

5881.ccd9ea1d674c8787.js

5881.ccd9ea1d674c8787.js

608 ms

webpack-1f197f6117b39c10.js

webpack-1f197f6117b39c10.js

609 ms

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

614 ms

main-48196b37a7e0d23e.js

main-48196b37a7e0d23e.js

957 ms

_app-ded32701fabc671a.js

_app-ded32701fabc671a.js

1146 ms

0c428ae2-952cefef04360c4d.js

0c428ae2-952cefef04360c4d.js

821 ms

814c6784-53aea3b2d1445094.js

814c6784-53aea3b2d1445094.js

957 ms

ae51ba48-1b1c139ad5cf67f2.js

ae51ba48-1b1c139ad5cf67f2.js

958 ms

252f366e-91204d24683d0282.js

252f366e-91204d24683d0282.js

958 ms

5675-284a25819788293b.js

5675-284a25819788293b.js

1014 ms

1664-e776988298a834da.js

1664-e776988298a834da.js

1019 ms

5155-cd8a4cb66d6b6c79.js

5155-cd8a4cb66d6b6c79.js

1132 ms

3253-7ab84c28f98b5dd8.js

3253-7ab84c28f98b5dd8.js

1141 ms

3740-ff99bc95a3915780.js

3740-ff99bc95a3915780.js

1148 ms

1216-75f35c662f1059e6.js

1216-75f35c662f1059e6.js

1217 ms

1714-735d743474a448a6.js

1714-735d743474a448a6.js

1228 ms

5820-4dac59fcfa7ca27a.js

5820-4dac59fcfa7ca27a.js

1321 ms

1574-b06502a9c40e17f9.js

1574-b06502a9c40e17f9.js

1331 ms

index-28828ce12822bc71.js

index-28828ce12822bc71.js

1337 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

1336 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

1419 ms

image

image

1466 ms

customer.svg

customer.svg

935 ms

support.svg

support.svg

947 ms

whatsapp.svg

whatsapp.svg

956 ms

person.svg

person.svg

956 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

1047 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

1124 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

1141 ms

x-twitter.svg

x-twitter.svg

1147 ms

image

image

1148 ms

image

image

1252 ms

image

image

1311 ms

image

image

1303 ms

vertical_line.svg

vertical_line.svg

1307 ms

Montserrat-Regular.2cf917c2.ttf

Montserrat-Regular.2cf917c2.ttf

1503 ms

slick.653a4cbb.woff

slick.653a4cbb.woff

1419 ms

search.svg

search.svg

1267 ms

image

image

1279 ms

image

image

1150 ms

image

image

1281 ms

image

image

1286 ms

image

image

1310 ms

image

image

1326 ms

image

image

1665 ms

image

image

1285 ms

image

image

1514 ms

image

image

1314 ms

image

image

1684 ms

image

image

1336 ms

image

image

1282 ms

image

image

1429 ms

image

image

1355 ms

image

image

1361 ms

image

image

1511 ms

image

image

1522 ms

Accessibility Review

lifecell.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifecell.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lifecell.in SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifecell.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifecell.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifecell.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifecell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: