1.8 sec in total
165 ms
1.3 sec
254 ms
Welcome to lifeguardtechnologies.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifeguardtechnologies best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifeguardtechnologies.com
At IMMI, “Bringing Safety to People” is more than a slogan, it’s our life-long mission. We’re experts in safety, with products that touch millions of lives all over the world.
Visit lifeguardtechnologies.comWe analyzed Lifeguardtechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lifeguardtechnologies.com performance score
165 ms
144 ms
43 ms
51 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lifeguardtechnologies.com, 73% (54 requests) were made to Imminet.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (445 ms) relates to the external source Imminet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 387.2 kB (14%)
2.8 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifeguardtechnologies.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeguardtechnologies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 203.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.9 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeguardtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (51%)
67
33
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeguardtechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeguardtechnologies.com
165 ms
www.imminet.com
144 ms
style.css
43 ms
extraStyles.css
51 ms
superfish.css
51 ms
nivo-slider.css
51 ms
qbf8vcl.js
146 ms
element.js
33 ms
youtube_simplegallery.css
52 ms
awp-columns.css
52 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
59 ms
modernizr.custom.64026.js
60 ms
jquery.js
99 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
63 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
62 ms
initialize.js
67 ms
thickbox.php
90 ms
hoverIntent.js
86 ms
superfish.js
87 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
88 ms
jquery.browser.min.js
91 ms
jquery.js
123 ms
thickbox.php
116 ms
anti-spam-4.1.js
116 ms
wp-embed.min.js
113 ms
d
268 ms
translateelement.css
62 ms
main.js
259 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
179 ms
analytics.js
176 ms
network-nav.png
128 ms
twitter.png
129 ms
facebook.png
128 ms
youtube.png
129 ms
search.png
129 ms
immi-logo.png
131 ms
Bus_IMMI.jpg
293 ms
12.jpg
348 ms
1.jpg
346 ms
Firefighter_IMMI.jpg
355 ms
UTV_IMMI.jpg
416 ms
blue-dark-gray-ribbon.png
260 ms
choose-industryBG.png
266 ms
playButton.jpg
273 ms
checkmark.png
290 ms
school-bus.jpg
346 ms
commercialtrucks.jpg
363 ms
fire-ems2.jpg
347 ms
military2.jpg
358 ms
offroad-utv1.jpg
367 ms
outdooradventure1.jpg
412 ms
off-highway2.jpg
414 ms
motorcoach1.jpg
411 ms
IMMI-Sabelt.jpg
411 ms
childcaretab-23.jpg
412 ms
clicktugsnug1.jpg
445 ms
cape-testing.jpg
445 ms
youtube2.png
437 ms
2CTS_2015_Final.png
439 ms
www.imminet.com
344 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
321 ms
AGcltlc=
129 ms
gJsObZbAAAA
125 ms
4rYT
123 ms
4C0Idtj8=
119 ms
+K2Ew==
117 ms
element_main.js
136 ms
collect
124 ms
p.gif
147 ms
translate_24dp.png
33 ms
l
45 ms
cleardot.gif
39 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
12 ms
pd.js
6 ms
lifeguardtechnologies.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeguardtechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeguardtechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeguardtechnologies.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifeguardtechnologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: