Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lifeguardtechnologies.com

Bringing Safety to People - IMMI

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

254 ms

lifeguardtechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifeguardtechnologies.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifeguardtechnologies best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifeguardtechnologies.com

At IMMI, “Bringing Safety to People” is more than a slogan, it’s our life-long mission. We’re experts in safety, with products that touch millions of lives all over the world.

Visit lifeguardtechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifeguardtechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifeguardtechnologies.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lifeguardtechnologies.com

165 ms

www.imminet.com

144 ms

style.css

43 ms

extraStyles.css

51 ms

superfish.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lifeguardtechnologies.com, 73% (54 requests) were made to Imminet.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (445 ms) relates to the external source Imminet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 387.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifeguardtechnologies.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

  • Original 42.9 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 98.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeguardtechnologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 203.9 kB

  • Original 388.4 kB
  • After minification 369.7 kB
  • After compression 184.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.9 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 65.3 kB
  • After minification 45.3 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeguardtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (51%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeguardtechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

lifeguardtechnologies.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeguardtechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeguardtechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifeguardtechnologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: