4 sec in total
629 ms
2.8 sec
582 ms
Click here to check amazing Lifehacker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifehacker.co.in
Unlocking New Horizons in Blogging: BloggersIdeas.com Acquires Lifehacker.co.in
Visit lifehacker.co.inWe analyzed Lifehacker.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lifehacker.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
629 ms
280 ms
26 ms
82 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Lifehacker.co.in, 7% (6 requests) were made to Static.clmbtech.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ad.crwdcntrl.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Jsso.indiatimes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.8 kB (36%)
1.1 MB
676.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifehacker.co.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 633.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifehacker needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 153.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifehacker.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64 B or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (46%)
80
43
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifehacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifehacker.co.in
629 ms
www.lifehacker.co.in
280 ms
css
26 ms
minify-1,version-2.cms
82 ms
minify-1,version-74.cms
87 ms
minify-1,v-7.cms
282 ms
version-2,minify-1.cms
92 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
minify-1,version-3.cms
83 ms
var=_ccaud
8 ms
msid-2147477990,pgtype-al,minify-1,version-11.cms
89 ms
minify-1,version-3.cms
172 ms
css_newsletter.cms
168 ms
cc.js
59 ms
minify-1,version-1.cms
162 ms
minify-1,version-17.cms
253 ms
minify-1,version-1.cms
167 ms
minify-1,version-63.cms
250 ms
minify-1,v-6.cms
249 ms
minify-1,version-5.cms
251 ms
minify-1,version-14.cms
252 ms
minify-1,version-10,channel-lifehacker.cms
343 ms
minify-1,version-1.cms
343 ms
pgtype-def,minify-1,version-28.cms
364 ms
17981456.cms
11 ms
49819184.cms
91 ms
17981456.cms
91 ms
No-Ones-Going-to-Steal-Your-Big-Idea.jpg
5 ms
Knowing-How-to-Improve-Doesnt-Matter-Unless-You-Build-New-Habits.jpg
9 ms
Ignore-Social-Media-When-Deciding-to-Buy-Something.jpg
28 ms
Dont-Pay-Money-Just-to-Delegate-Your-Major-Life-Decisions.jpg
30 ms
44802930.cms
93 ms
22658783.cms
121 ms
19712879.cms
120 ms
38122042.cms
141 ms
gpt.js
27 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
beacon.js
28 ms
28467421.cms
247 ms
33169681.cms
243 ms
30209029.cms
230 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
15 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
59 ms
oswald-regular-webfont.woff
201 ms
lXoKq2PC8Z_S1wl-BwvrB-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
37 ms
oswald-light-webfont.woff
201 ms
oswald-bold-webfont.woff
201 ms
DroidSans-Bold-webfont.woff
203 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
255 ms
dosis-regular-webfont.woff
256 ms
dosis-light-webfont.woff
255 ms
dosis-bold-webfont.woff
255 ms
container.html
10 ms
28467488.cms
325 ms
44802943.cms
290 ms
49074001.cms
290 ms
50638869.cms
278 ms
Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff
270 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
270 ms
Roboto-Light-webfont.woff
270 ms
fbds.js
81 ms
colombia_v2.js
80 ms
48326337.cms
208 ms
48326344.cms
209 ms
48360183.cms
231 ms
Are-we-all-getting-fatter.jpg
210 ms
5-Advanced-Yoga-Asanas-for-Extreme-Fitness.jpg
356 ms
This-is-How-Much-You-Need-to-Exercise-to-Burn-Calories-FromJunk-Food.jpg
263 ms
Find-out-who-unfriended-you-on-Facebook.jpg
273 ms
Five-Utility-Apps-That-Can-Make-Your-Life-Easier.jpg
295 ms
20-Inspirational-Steve-Jobs-Quotes-That-Can-Change-Your-Life.jpg
291 ms
93 ms
callback=ccuad
30 ms
jsrender.cms
126 ms
v4.htm
535 ms
getTicket
1029 ms
db336e40ebafc9d67d3ad5e017417ebf_0.jpg
15 ms
http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.forbes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F%2F2015%2F08%2FFeature-Image-Scarlet.jpg
138 ms
c9c19ddc219062c56fe87421e1bc2575_0.jpg
21 ms
48f91b94f4b95a934d1b98b3e44c5e65_0.jpg
18 ms
edddde614d88df0a86808efede00739e_0.jpg
10 ms
colombia-icon.png
3 ms
lifehacker.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lifehacker.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifehacker.co.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifehacker.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifehacker.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifehacker.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifehacker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: