2.6 sec in total
446 ms
1.9 sec
245 ms
Welcome to lifelites.com homepage info - get ready to check Life Lites best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifelites.com
LifeLites LLC
Visit lifelites.comWe analyzed Lifelites.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lifelites.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.217
57/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
446 ms
195 ms
199 ms
196 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelites.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifelites.com.
Page size can be reduced by 378.2 kB (56%)
672.9 kB
294.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifelites.com main page is 672.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 265.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Lites images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifelites.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (79%)
72
15
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Lites. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifelites.com
446 ms
aggregator.css
195 ms
node.css
199 ms
defaults.css
196 ms
system.css
263 ms
system-menus.css
196 ms
user.css
152 ms
content-module.css
231 ms
colorbox_default_style.css
325 ms
filefield.css
276 ms
fivestar.css
263 ms
oxygen.css
276 ms
lightbox.css
309 ms
quotes.css
329 ms
simplenews.css
330 ms
thickbox.css
340 ms
thickbox_ie.css
341 ms
uc_quote.css
387 ms
uc_attribute.css
390 ms
uc_order.css
397 ms
uc_product.css
400 ms
uc_store.css
406 ms
video_filter.css
408 ms
views.css
466 ms
style.css
647 ms
typography.css
466 ms
superfish.css
463 ms
superfish-navbar.css
473 ms
superfish-vertical.css
474 ms
acquia-prosper-style.css
721 ms
gray.css
729 ms
grid16-960.css
535 ms
jquery.min.js
833 ms
drupal.js
642 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
668 ms
colorbox.js
711 ms
colorbox_default_style.js
649 ms
fivestar.js
658 ms
lightbox.js
786 ms
poormanscron.js
593 ms
thickbox.js
665 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
618 ms
hoverIntent.js
628 ms
supposition.js
615 ms
supersubs.js
628 ms
superfish.js
633 ms
script.js
645 ms
jquery.corner.js
616 ms
acquia-prosper-script.js
619 ms
slideshowholder.php
114 ms
teaser_left.png
430 ms
spacer.png
207 ms
teaser_center.png
514 ms
teaser_right.png
445 ms
secondary-menu-bg.png
69 ms
search-bg.png
68 ms
search-icon.png
71 ms
acquia_prosper_logo.png
70 ms
primary-menu-bg.png
141 ms
2%20%28Custom%29.JPG
138 ms
3%20%28Custom%29.JPG
139 ms
free_shipping_1.png
198 ms
download.jpg
140 ms
spacer_body.png
202 ms
loading_animation.gif
204 ms
controls.png
206 ms
jquery.js
45 ms
galleria.min.js
5 ms
galleria.flickr.min.js
158 ms
galleria.classic.min.js
80 ms
galleria.classic.css
79 ms
classic-loader.gif
79 ms
classic-map-dark.png
69 ms
lifelites.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lifelites.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifelites.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelites.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifelites.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifelites.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Life Lites. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: