5.6 sec in total
2 sec
3.1 sec
545 ms
Visit lifeonnetwork.com now to see the best up-to-date Life On Network content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeonnetwork.com
Life On Network - IT Support
Visit lifeonnetwork.comWe analyzed Lifeonnetwork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lifeonnetwork.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,700 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.186
65/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
1982 ms
136 ms
147 ms
145 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeonnetwork.com, 25% (31 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Graph.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeonnetwork.com.
Page size can be reduced by 663.2 kB (66%)
1.0 MB
349.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeonnetwork.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 579.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life On Network images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 389.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeonnetwork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 97 (80%)
122
25
The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life On Network. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeonnetwork.com
1982 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
136 ms
crayon.min.css
147 ms
classic.css
145 ms
monaco.css
154 ms
style.css
147 ms
style.min.css
152 ms
style.css
213 ms
style.css
228 ms
genericons.css
295 ms
jetpack.css
231 ms
plusone.js
69 ms
jquery.js
352 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
240 ms
crayon.min.js
292 ms
frontend.js
312 ms
scripts.js
334 ms
services.css
56 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
84 ms
wpgroho.js
294 ms
wp-embed.min.js
391 ms
postmessage.js
391 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
393 ms
jquery.inview.js
393 ms
queuehandler.js
393 ms
sharing.js
408 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
7 ms
widget.js
64 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
103 ms
5308f7ba6c4bdaa589989ec83bc962cf
105 ms
header.png
104 ms
bg-top.png
102 ms
search-button.png
104 ms
mm.png
103 ms
bg.png
104 ms
bg-content.png
447 ms
icons.png
449 ms
chart-bar.png
448 ms
taxonomy-bg.png
449 ms
buttons.png
449 ms
bg-sidebar.png
450 ms
rss.png
450 ms
loading.gif
451 ms
arrow.gif
416 ms
footer.png
415 ms
droidsans-bold-webfont.woff
411 ms
Genericons.svg
412 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
17 ms
monaco-webfont.woff
410 ms
collect
353 ms
widget.css
7 ms
master.html
334 ms
hovercard.css
86 ms
share
167 ms
g.gif
71 ms
count.json
141 ms
graph.facebook.com
182 ms
share
180 ms
count.json
138 ms
graph.facebook.com
238 ms
share
203 ms
count.json
137 ms
graph.facebook.com
255 ms
share
204 ms
count.json
134 ms
graph.facebook.com
257 ms
share
173 ms
count.json
131 ms
graph.facebook.com
243 ms
share
394 ms
count.json
131 ms
graph.facebook.com
258 ms
share
195 ms
count.json
161 ms
graph.facebook.com
253 ms
share
197 ms
count.json
159 ms
graph.facebook.com
295 ms
share
192 ms
count.json
157 ms
graph.facebook.com
316 ms
share
195 ms
count.json
156 ms
graph.facebook.com
314 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
134 ms
g.gif
149 ms
g.gif
148 ms
g.gif
149 ms
g.gif
148 ms
g.gif
149 ms
g.gif
147 ms
g.gif
153 ms
g.gif
153 ms
g.gif
153 ms
g.gif
153 ms
g.gif
152 ms
g.gif
151 ms
g.gif
155 ms
g.gif
156 ms
g.gif
156 ms
g.gif
156 ms
g.gif
154 ms
g.gif
154 ms
g.gif
157 ms
g.gif
157 ms
g.gif
159 ms
g.gif
157 ms
g.gif
159 ms
338 ms
g.gif
137 ms
jquery.js
89 ms
postmessage.js
6 ms
jed.js
6 ms
underscore.min.js
7 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
3 ms
22 ms
16 ms
likes-rest.js
9 ms
lifeonnetwork.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
lifeonnetwork.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifeonnetwork.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeonnetwork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeonnetwork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeonnetwork.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life On Network. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: