1.6 sec in total
51 ms
1.4 sec
206 ms
Click here to check amazing Life Reconsidered content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifereconsidered.com
helping Christians engage more effectively across racial/ethnic, cultural, religious, socioeconomic, & political divides
Visit lifereconsidered.comWe analyzed Lifereconsidered.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lifereconsidered.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.314
37/100
15%
Value24.7 s
0/100
10%
51 ms
770 ms
93 ms
95 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Lifereconsidered.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 17% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (770 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifereconsidered.com.
Page size can be reduced by 86.6 kB (28%)
310.5 kB
223.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifereconsidered.com main page is 310.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 161.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Reconsidered images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 271 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifereconsidered.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)
32
6
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Reconsidered. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifereconsidered.com
51 ms
lifereconsidered.com
770 ms
webfont.js
93 ms
95 ms
style.css
116 ms
121 ms
130 ms
css
135 ms
129 ms
129 ms
global.css
127 ms
123 ms
hovercards.min.js
130 ms
wpgroho.js
132 ms
130 ms
smart.js
137 ms
124 ms
w.js
131 ms
css
59 ms
print.css
4 ms
conf
102 ms
importmap-polyfill.min.js
8 ms
img_4791.png
349 ms
g.gif
88 ms
remote-login.php
146 ms
magnify.png
5 ms
bubble.png
5 ms
g.gif
100 ms
g.gif
101 ms
image.jpg
222 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmYWRm.ttf
101 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
107 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
101 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf
106 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf
100 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-ciZJ.ttf
60 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZVsf_.ttf
60 ms
Genericons.svg
21 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
2 ms
ata.js
60 ms
actionbar.css
3 ms
actionbar.js
2 ms
lifereconsidered.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Links do not have a discernible name
lifereconsidered.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lifereconsidered.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifereconsidered.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifereconsidered.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifereconsidered.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Reconsidered. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: