Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

lifestylefood.com.au

LifeStyle Food Recipes & TV Shows | Foxtel

Page Load Speed

40.6 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

33.8 sec

Page Rendered

4.8 sec

lifestylefood.com.au screenshot

About Website

Visit lifestylefood.com.au now to see the best up-to-date Life Style Food content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifestylefood.com.au

Watch your favourite chefs embark on a food journey around the world & learn how to make their recipes. Find out what LifeStyle Food on Foxtel has to offer.

Visit lifestylefood.com.au

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifestylefood.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 38.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

lifestylefood.com.au performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,190 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifestylefood.com.au

1994 ms

www.lifestylefood.com.au

2237 ms

58eb66d2e45a1df252bd94d5.js

1593 ms

master.less

1823 ms

master.part-b.less

2844 ms

Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Lifestylefood.com.au, 31% (43 requests) were made to Cdn.lifestyle.com.au and 6% (8 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifestylefood.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (33%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifestylefood.com.au main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 252.3 kB

  • Original 303.2 kB
  • After minification 271.1 kB
  • After compression 50.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Style Food images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 756.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifestylefood.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (53%)

Requests Now

130

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 130 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Style Food. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifestylefood.com.au accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifestylefood.com.au best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifestylefood.com.au SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestylefood.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifestylefood.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Style Food. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: