4 sec in total
921 ms
2 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Liffl content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liffl.com
Visit liffl.comWe analyzed Liffl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 921 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
liffl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.175
69/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
921 ms
46 ms
67 ms
81 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Liffl.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (921 ms) belongs to the original domain Liffl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 277.8 kB (25%)
1.1 MB
852.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Liffl.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 783.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liffl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liffl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)
43
29
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liffl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liffl.com
921 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
67 ms
dashicons.min.css
81 ms
sportspress.css
62 ms
icons.css
63 ms
app.css
62 ms
bootstrap.min.css
96 ms
bst.css
77 ms
jquery.min.js
52 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
style.css
90 ms
responsive.css
91 ms
css
78 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
74 ms
css
91 ms
collect
39 ms
lightbox.css
155 ms
instagramLite.js
159 ms
lightbox.js
295 ms
jquery.form.min.js
297 ms
scripts.js
292 ms
scripts.min.js
295 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
320 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
295 ms
sportspress.js
296 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
296 ms
html5shiv.js
297 ms
respond.min.js
296 ms
bootstrap.js
327 ms
bst.js
297 ms
comment-reply.min.js
315 ms
wp-embed.min.js
316 ms
body-bg.jpg
216 ms
top-img.png
219 ms
nav-bg.jpg
198 ms
sprin-slider.jpg
202 ms
tigerbloods.jpg
268 ms
elite-champs.jpg
263 ms
philly-honey-badgers-champs.jpg
272 ms
hall-of-fame-1.jpg
199 ms
register-home.png
216 ms
youtube-channel.jpg
200 ms
team.jpg
215 ms
awards.jpg
216 ms
register.jpg
218 ms
logic.jpg
217 ms
under-armour.jpg
218 ms
main-event.jpg
218 ms
usftl.jpg
218 ms
flag-spin.jpg
219 ms
close.png
205 ms
loading.gif
204 ms
prev.png
101 ms
next.png
101 ms
jquery.tmpl.min.js
98 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
64 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
64 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
63 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
63 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
62 ms
i1bGh1uwf-wYhZyrRS8UOA.ttf
46 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
105 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
107 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
105 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
44 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
105 ms
search
514 ms
pattern-bg.png
116 ms
spons-over.png
117 ms
widgets.js
336 ms
liffl.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
liffl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
liffl.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liffl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Liffl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liffl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liffl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: