Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

lightcrescent.com

Light Crescent - Material Lifting and Handling Equipments Manufacturing Company

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

807 ms

lightcrescent.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lightcrescent.com now to see the best up-to-date Light Crescent content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lightcrescent.com

Light Crescent - We are pioneers in the fabrication of Lifting Equipment, Industrial Lifting Equipment and Material Handling Equipment, widely used in numerous industries in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnat...

Visit lightcrescent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightcrescent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightcrescent.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lightcrescent.com

17 ms

lightcrescent.com

47 ms

themify-icons.css

36 ms

flaticon.css

23 ms

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Lightcrescent.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (467 ms) belongs to the original domain Lightcrescent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (14%)

Content Size

7.3 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Lightcrescent.com main page is 7.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 62.1 kB

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 36.8 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.5 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 953.2 kB

  • Original 7.1 MB
  • After minification 6.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Light Crescent needs image optimization as it can save up to 953.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 71 B

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightcrescent.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (36%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Light Crescent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lightcrescent.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lightcrescent.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lightcrescent.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightcrescent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lightcrescent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Light Crescent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: