Access lilove.ru. LILOVE.RU

lilove.ru screenshot

26

Performance

Renders faster than
46% of other websites
52

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 21% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
36% of websites
92

SEO

Google-friendlier than
75% of websites

First Response

790 ms

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

lilove.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing LILOVE content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lilove.ru

YOUR DESCRIPTION HERE

Visit lilove.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Lilove.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 790 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.491

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

lilove.ru

790 ms

my.css

363 ms

css

27 ms

base.css

392 ms

layer7.css

394 ms

Our browser made a total of 189 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lilove.ru, 16% (30 requests) were made to Ads.betweendigital.com and 5% (10 requests) were made to Ddnk.advertur.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lilove.ru.

Content Size

528.1 kB

After Optimization

380.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Lilove.ru main page is 528.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 253.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

Original 24.6 kB
After minification 24.1 kB
After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

Original 253.8 kB
After minification 233.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LILOVE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

Original 180.9 kB
After minification 160.2 kB
After compression 123.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 49.8 kB

Original 68.8 kB
After minification 63.5 kB
After compression 19.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lilove.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Now

152

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 152 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LILOVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lilove.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lilove.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lilove.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LILOVE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: