2.2 sec in total
174 ms
1.7 sec
294 ms
Welcome to linceco.com homepage info - get ready to check Linceco best content right away, or after learning these important things about linceco.com
The premium domain name linceco.com is available for sale!
Visit linceco.comWe analyzed Linceco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
linceco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value5.2 s
75/100
10%
174 ms
13 ms
271 ms
299 ms
253 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Linceco.com, 81% (105 requests) were made to Kit-pro.fontawesome.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (435 ms) relates to the external source Sav.com.
Page size can be reduced by 48.8 kB (30%)
165.3 kB
116.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Linceco.com main page is 165.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 81.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linceco.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (70%)
20
6
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linceco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
linceco.com
174 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
bootstrap.min.css
271 ms
ef48a658a5.js
299 ms
all.css
253 ms
for_sale_lander.css
116 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
262 ms
popper.min.js
294 ms
bootstrap.min.js
398 ms
jquery.fittext.min.js
400 ms
collect
183 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
319 ms
pro-v4-shims.min.css
313 ms
pro-v4-font-face.min.css
336 ms
pro.min.css
338 ms
css
279 ms
Blue_No_Com.png
230 ms
icann-accredited.png
435 ms
index.html
75 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf
119 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf
127 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf
170 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf
204 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
94 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
106 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.15.0.woff
104 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.14.0.woff
103 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.13.0.woff
101 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.12.1.woff
104 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.12.0.woff
112 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.2.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.1.woff
110 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.11.0.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.10.2.woff
109 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.10.1.woff
110 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.9.0.woff
163 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.8.2.woff
156 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.8.0.woff
112 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.7.1.woff
112 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.7.0.woff
108 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.3.woff
112 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.1.woff
138 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.6.0.woff
140 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.5.0.woff
136 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.4.1.woff
140 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.4.0.woff
139 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.3.0.woff
136 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.2.0.woff
152 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.1.1.woff
146 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.1.0.woff
148 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.13.woff
239 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.11.woff
147 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.10.woff
254 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.9.woff
255 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.7.woff
254 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.5.woff
273 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.3.woff
274 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.1.woff
275 ms
pro-fa-light-300-5.0.0.woff
306 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.15.0.woff
275 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.14.0.woff
284 ms
polyfill.min.js
305 ms
main.js
50 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.13.0.woff
252 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.12.1.woff
252 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.12.0.woff
252 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.2.woff
252 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.1.woff
274 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.11.0.woff
297 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.10.2.woff
276 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.10.1.woff
279 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.9.0.woff
281 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.8.2.woff
259 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.8.0.woff
256 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.7.1.woff
251 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.7.0.woff
253 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.3.woff
244 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.1.woff
245 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.6.0.woff
249 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.5.0.woff
239 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.4.1.woff
228 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.4.0.woff
226 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.3.0.woff
238 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.2.0.woff
236 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.1.1.woff
238 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.1.0.woff
233 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.13.woff
229 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.11.woff
229 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.10.woff
210 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.9.woff
198 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.7.woff
197 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.5.woff
203 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.3.woff
181 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.1.woff
178 ms
pro-fa-regular-400-5.0.0.woff
180 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.15.0.woff
180 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.14.0.woff
172 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.13.0.woff
159 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.12.1.woff
158 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.12.0.woff
157 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.2.woff
156 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.1.woff
155 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.11.0.woff
130 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.10.2.woff
127 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.10.1.woff
124 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.9.0.woff
122 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.8.2.woff
121 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.8.0.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.7.1.woff
108 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.7.0.woff
108 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.3.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.1.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.6.0.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.5.0.woff
111 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.4.1.woff
109 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.4.0.woff
104 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.3.0.woff
103 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.2.0.woff
103 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.1.1.woff
101 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.1.0.woff
101 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.13.woff
101 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.11.woff
100 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.10.woff
99 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.9.woff
34 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.7.woff
33 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.5.woff
33 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.3.woff
31 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.1.woff
31 ms
pro-fa-solid-900-5.0.0.woff
31 ms
linceco.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
linceco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
linceco.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linceco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Linceco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
linceco.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linceco. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: