3.9 sec in total
759 ms
3 sec
204 ms
Click here to check amazing Lindum content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lindum.no
Gjennom 25 år har Lindum kontinuerlig søkt etter – og tatt i bruk – innovative løsninger for å utnytte ressursene som finnes i avfall.
Visit lindum.noWe analyzed Lindum.no page load time and found that the first response time was 759 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lindum.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
Value16,640 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value29.9 s
0/100
10%
759 ms
226 ms
226 ms
565 ms
338 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Lindum.no, 27% (23 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lindum.no.
Page size can be reduced by 507.9 kB (11%)
4.6 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Lindum.no main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lindum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (41%)
78
46
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lindum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lindum.no
759 ms
main.css
226 ms
modernizr.js
226 ms
jquery.min.js
565 ms
jquery.cycle2.core.js
338 ms
jquery.cycle2.tmpl.js
257 ms
jquery.cycle2.autoheight.js
257 ms
jquery.cycle2.pager.js
337 ms
jquery.cycle2.command.js
338 ms
jquery.cycle2.caption.js
339 ms
fastclick.js
339 ms
main.js
449 ms
webfont.js
27 ms
analytics.min.js
381 ms
ms
79 ms
logo-lindum.png
319 ms
logo-payoff.png
210 ms
bg-menu.png
211 ms
icon-mobile-menu-trigger.png
212 ms
slide_6.png
1813 ms
slide_2.png
1702 ms
slide_3.png
1703 ms
slide_4.png
1975 ms
slide_5.png
1949 ms
Mottak_av_forurenset_grunn_flere_steder_p%C3%A5_%C3%98stlandet_-_Kopi.jpg
1083 ms
_DSC0376_-_Kopi.jpg
1589 ms
quote-box.png
1712 ms
s_og_s2.png
1822 ms
container_ikon3.png
1826 ms
jord_ikon2.png
1828 ms
Biogassanlegg_94_94_c1.jpg
1930 ms
Restavfall_94_94_c1.jpg
1939 ms
Levende_matjord_94_94_c1.jpg
1940 ms
css
32 ms
AKu1CjQ4qnV8MUltkAX3sM2kigAIKUS7C8wDj9A45hI.ttf
7 ms
6LmGj5dOJopQKEkt88GowWAK5Gcw6LbjBo2-NRTaHPD3rGVtsTkPsbDajuO5ueQw.ttf
15 ms
embed
762 ms
p
255 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
14 ms
rs=ABjfnFW3NcDEAUOJhqBLkb_g7tp8huHPRg
54 ms
css
86 ms
js
110 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
72 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
48 ms
common.js
38 ms
map.js
70 ms
overlay.js
119 ms
util.js
139 ms
marker.js
135 ms
geocoder.js
99 ms
controls.js
122 ms
places_impl.js
122 ms
selection_2x-000.png
96 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
123 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
191 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
208 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
243 ms
gen204
116 ms
onion.js
118 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
180 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
110 ms
stats.js
89 ms
transparent.png
92 ms
mapcnt6.png
76 ms
tmapctrl4.png
38 ms
vt
40 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
23 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
27 ms
vt
30 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
41 ms
vt
50 ms
viewer-icons001.png
81 ms
star4.png
85 ms
gen204
86 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
50 ms
MyMaps_Icons003.png
25 ms
mymaps_32.png
24 ms
v1_4593b7d7.png
25 ms
google-my-maps-logo-small-001.png
25 ms
kh
72 ms
lindum.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lindum.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lindum.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lindum.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lindum.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lindum.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lindum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: