1.2 sec in total
110 ms
925 ms
129 ms
Welcome to liquiddietdiscussion.com homepage info - get ready to check Liquiddietdiscussion best content right away, or after learning these important things about liquiddietdiscussion.com
Visit liquiddietdiscussion.comWe analyzed Liquiddietdiscussion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
liquiddietdiscussion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value5.2 s
60/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
110 ms
95 ms
172 ms
253 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Liquiddietdiscussion.com, 89% (17 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (1 request) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (331 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 32.2 kB (54%)
59.6 kB
27.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Liquiddietdiscussion.com main page is 59.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 45.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liquiddietdiscussion images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)
17
6
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liquiddietdiscussion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
liquiddietdiscussion.com
110 ms
NewLifestyleDiet
95 ms
bRoxlaUpJR8.css
172 ms
ZY-3seVVf0G.css
253 ms
wakJkBioHgT.css
282 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
291 ms
RDCmA36AiNe.css
293 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
331 ms
ZVyMWStefv_.png
41 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
43 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
38 ms
LXQaqfwANV7.png
42 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
118 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
50 ms
_UYztdBNTjs.js
55 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
59 ms
7BE0CZr3HTs.js
94 ms
RTHSWgdzleR.js
89 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
151 ms
liquiddietdiscussion.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
liquiddietdiscussion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
liquiddietdiscussion.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liquiddietdiscussion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Liquiddietdiscussion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liquiddietdiscussion.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liquiddietdiscussion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: