Tools & Wizards About Us
liteblue-login.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

721 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

liteblue-login.org screenshot

About Website

Visit liteblue-login.org now to see the best up-to-date Liteblue Login content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liteblue-login.org

Visit liteblue-login.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Liteblue-login.org page load time and found that the first response time was 721 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liteblue-login.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.liteblue-login.org

721 ms

2awct.css

481 ms

css

72 ms

2awct.js

397 ms

adsbygoogle.js

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Liteblue-login.org, 12% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (915 ms) belongs to the original domain Liteblue-login.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.6 kB (65%)

Content Size

653.7 kB

After Optimization

227.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Liteblue-login.org main page is 653.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 298.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 43.8 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Liteblue Login needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 138.1 kB

  • Original 267.8 kB
  • After minification 267.8 kB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.1 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 249.6 kB

  • Original 298.1 kB
  • After minification 297.8 kB
  • After compression 48.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liteblue-login.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 249.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liteblue Login. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.liteblue-login.org

www.liteblue-login.org

721 ms

2awct.css

2awct.css

481 ms

css

css

72 ms

2awct.js

2awct.js

397 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

94 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

112 ms

170c3abe06f19ce66f9f38ec4ed9b9f4

170c3abe06f19ce66f9f38ec4ed9b9f4

72 ms

autoptimize_32f671d55aa14d3df93e9ac309061a0b.js

autoptimize_32f671d55aa14d3df93e9ac309061a0b.js

706 ms

close-mobile.png

close-mobile.png

301 ms

liteblue-login.png

liteblue-login.png

706 ms

liteblue-postalease.png

liteblue-postalease.png

705 ms

liteblue_usps-1.jpg

liteblue_usps-1.jpg

915 ms

9412b57acfa30f37723b309342646867

9412b57acfa30f37723b309342646867

77 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

389 ms

border_striped_horizontal.png

border_striped_horizontal.png

456 ms

crossword.png

crossword.png

466 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

498 ms

SEO Factors

liteblue-login.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liteblue-login.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Liteblue-login.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

liteblue-login.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: