3.8 sec in total
901 ms
2.5 sec
393 ms
Click here to check amazing Liteblue content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about liteblue.info
Visit liteblue.infoWe analyzed Liteblue.info page load time and found that the first response time was 901 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
liteblue.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
901 ms
142 ms
261 ms
163 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Liteblue.info, 15% (8 requests) were made to Contextual.media.net and 12% (6 requests) were made to Dsum.casalemedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (901 ms) belongs to the original domain Liteblue.info.
Page size can be reduced by 354.6 kB (62%)
568.3 kB
213.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Liteblue.info main page is 568.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 417.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liteblue images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 287.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)
42
8
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liteblue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.liteblue.info
901 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
142 ms
jquery.js
261 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
tw-sack.min.js
140 ms
nmedianet.js
23 ms
wp-embed.min.js
103 ms
liteblue-header.jpg
166 ms
liteblue-usps-300x236.jpg
67 ms
magnifier2-gray.gif
77 ms
px.gif
17 ms
px.gif
53 ms
bping.php
8 ms
jstag
17 ms
fcmdynet.js
92 ms
checksync.php
79 ms
abp.gif
14 ms
abp.gif
14 ms
usermatch
54 ms
mediamain.html
704 ms
hmclient.js
31 ms
smclient.js
32 ms
bping.php
10 ms
fcmdynet.js
96 ms
usermatch
21 ms
abp.gif
5 ms
abp.gif
12 ms
gr
28 ms
csle
19 ms
pm_match
25 ms
ecsync.php
15 ms
csync.php
142 ms
rum
23 ms
rum
229 ms
log.php
15 ms
check
12 ms
pixel
87 ms
rum
30 ms
rum
138 ms
rum
36 ms
crum
38 ms
mediamain.html
574 ms
inputbackgr.gif
85 ms
fcmdynet.js
226 ms
bping.php
7 ms
pixel
16 ms
abp.gif
4 ms
abp.gif
5 ms
m
37 ms
crum
10 ms
crum
11 ms
mediamain.html
315 ms
liteblue.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
liteblue.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
liteblue.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liteblue.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Liteblue.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liteblue.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Liteblue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: