3 sec in total
288 ms
2.3 sec
391 ms
Welcome to litg.de homepage info - get ready to check LiTG best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about litg.de
Die Deutsche Lichttechnische Gesellschaft e.V. (LiTG) ist das Netzwerk aller Licht-Interessierten in Deutschland.
Visit litg.deWe analyzed Litg.de page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
litg.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
288 ms
847 ms
99 ms
198 ms
288 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Litg.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (847 ms) belongs to the original domain Litg.de.
Page size can be reduced by 135.4 kB (13%)
1.0 MB
872.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Litg.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 744.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LiTG needs image optimization as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litg.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)
29
18
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LiTG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litg.de
288 ms
www.litg.de
847 ms
fontface.css
99 ms
style.css
198 ms
mobile.css
288 ms
cookiebar.css
287 ms
jquery.min.js
392 ms
raphael-min.js
408 ms
bezirkskarte.js
292 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
311 ms
datepicker-de.js
378 ms
cookiebar.js
380 ms
selectbox.min.js
384 ms
snap.svg-min.js
437 ms
java.js
576 ms
body-bg.jpg
188 ms
litg-logo.svg
186 ms
mainmenu-bg.png
100 ms
Meldungen-3-11384.jpg
102 ms
Newsletter-14254.jpg
168 ms
2024-Banner-37177.png
169 ms
BANNER-webseite-WEITERBILDUNG-FUeR-INNEN--UND-AUSSENBELEUCHTUNG-37186.png
286 ms
Partner-35521.png
196 ms
MIT-35524.png
342 ms
Design-ohne-Titel-35828.png
250 ms
Titelbild-allgemein1-37163.png
479 ms
Design-ohne-Titel--1--37062.png
284 ms
Screenshot-2024-05-07-121051-37040.png
384 ms
Licht-Touren-auf-der-L-B--1--37018.png
349 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-18-133319-36976.png
382 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-18-134912-36964.png
478 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
381 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
401 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
422 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
431 ms
litg.woff
472 ms
litg.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litg.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
litg.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litg.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litg.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litg.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LiTG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: