5.3 sec in total
165 ms
4.7 sec
448 ms
Click here to check amazing Lithe content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lithe.in
Lithe Technologies believes in leveraging technology to automate manual work and empower management we are best POS solution in Ahmedabad,Surat and Baroda.
Visit lithe.inWe analyzed Lithe.in page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lithe.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value21.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value3,900 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
165 ms
510 ms
240 ms
480 ms
482 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lithe.in, 50% (44 requests) were made to Testeposlithe.cloudapp.net and 14% (12 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Testeposlithe.cloudapp.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (39%)
2.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Lithe.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 180 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180 B or 42% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lithe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 785.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 785.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lithe.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (45%)
80
44
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lithe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lithe.in
165 ms
510 ms
animation.css
240 ms
common.css
480 ms
fonts.css
482 ms
flexslider.css
483 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
486 ms
meanmenu.css
490 ms
responsive.css
491 ms
jquery.min.js
960 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
725 ms
fadeimages.js
726 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
729 ms
jquery.disablescroll.min.js
730 ms
main.js
733 ms
skrollr-animation.js
1053 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1576 ms
analytics.js
671 ms
embed
697 ms
msg91Badge.png
1357 ms
lithe-technologies-logo.png
691 ms
banner-ebqms.jpg
910 ms
banner-epos.jpg
1060 ms
banner-spot-billing.jpg
907 ms
banner-ecommerce.jpg
762 ms
banner-epos-inner.jpg
1501 ms
tablet-banner-bg.png
1600 ms
question-img.png
1054 ms
bullet.png
1212 ms
banner-ebqms-inner.jpg
2631 ms
dwn-icn.png
1253 ms
banner-billing-inner.jpg
1992 ms
banner-ecom-inner.jpg
2119 ms
products-btm-bg.png
1961 ms
products-top-bg.png
1981 ms
top-arrows.png
1836 ms
clientele-bg.png
2311 ms
about-us-bg.png
2435 ms
q-color.png
2222 ms
career-bg.png
2235 ms
career-path.png
2356 ms
client_list.php
1848 ms
country_list.php
1862 ms
tooltip.png
1917 ms
ssbWT9UCcfI
114 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1961 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
2040 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
2084 ms
collect
29 ms
js
113 ms
init_embed.js
60 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
29 ms
www-embed-player.js
76 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
34 ms
ad_status.js
102 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
93 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
94 ms
common.js
67 ms
map.js
81 ms
google4.png
22 ms
overlay.js
294 ms
util.js
45 ms
onion.js
43 ms
stats.js
42 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
103 ms
controls.js
55 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
92 ms
transparent.png
49 ms
kh
173 ms
kh
149 ms
css
138 ms
entity11.png
94 ms
mapcnt6.png
53 ms
tmapctrl.png
39 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
67 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
71 ms
vt
83 ms
vt
84 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
7 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
15 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
29 ms
arrows.png
240 ms
lithe.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lithe.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lithe.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lithe.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lithe.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lithe.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lithe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: