Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    47% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    72% of websites

lithonplus.de

Lithon Website

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

340 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

421 ms

lithonplus.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lithon Plus content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lithonplus.de

Pflastersteine und Gestaltungspflaster für die Gestaltung von Haus und Garten. Städte und Kommunen finden hier eine große Auswahl an Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten.

Visit lithonplus.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Lithonplus.de page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lithonplus.de performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,930 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lithonplus.de

340 ms

www.lithonplus-steinmanufaktur.de

544 ms

ccm.base.css

101 ms

jquery.js

450 ms

ccm.base.js

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lithonplus.de, 74% (23 requests) were made to Lithonplus-steinmanufaktur.de and 16% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (835 ms) relates to the external source Lithonplus-steinmanufaktur.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 898.1 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Lithonplus.de main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 58.0 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lithon Plus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 490.0 kB

  • Original 680.0 kB
  • After minification 583.9 kB
  • After compression 189.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 490.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 339.1 kB

  • Original 368.0 kB
  • After minification 165.1 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lithonplus.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lithon Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lithonplus.de accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lithonplus.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lithonplus.de SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lithonplus.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lithonplus.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lithon Plus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: