3.2 sec in total
686 ms
2.2 sec
241 ms
Visit livebrazen.com now to see the best up-to-date Livebrazen content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livebrazen.com
One Vulnerability Blooper at a Time
Visit livebrazen.comWe analyzed Livebrazen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 686 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
livebrazen.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.3 s
0/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value30.9 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
686 ms
76 ms
139 ms
188 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Livebrazen.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) belongs to the original domain Livebrazen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 371.0 kB (40%)
924.4 kB
553.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Livebrazen.com main page is 924.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 490.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livebrazen needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 166.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livebrazen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)
63
15
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livebrazen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.livebrazen.com
686 ms
layout.css
76 ms
custom.css
139 ms
tfg_style.css
188 ms
styles.css
155 ms
pps_style.css
155 ms
css
28 ms
public.css
157 ms
magnific-popup.css
159 ms
wpp.css
204 ms
jquery.js
274 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
207 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
209 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
209 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
252 ms
jquery.cookie.js
271 ms
public.js
272 ms
bPopup.min.js
294 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
295 ms
jquery.cookie.js
316 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
336 ms
pps_script.js
338 ms
external-tracking.min.js
338 ms
eStore_extra_shortcode_css.css
340 ms
simple-pull-quote.css
358 ms
load.sumome.com
474 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
381 ms
wp_eStore_custom_style.css
401 ms
eStore_read_form.js
402 ms
css
30 ms
widgets.js
5 ms
jquery.form.min.js
412 ms
scripts.js
413 ms
wp-embed.min.js
468 ms
css
14 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
328 ms
font-awesome.css
26 ms
ga.js
22 ms
displays.htm
117 ms
ready.png
116 ms
signature-products.png
116 ms
be-brazen-in-biz.png
306 ms
For-main-website.png
305 ms
lisaheadshot9450.jpeg
306 ms
manifesto_bg.png
432 ms
manifesto-sidebar.png
412 ms
facebook.png
304 ms
twitter.png
306 ms
linked-in.png
306 ms
youtube.png
307 ms
pinterest.png
308 ms
displays.htm
161 ms
j.php
16 ms
fbds.js
54 ms
livebrazen-banner-orange.jpg
550 ms
sdk.js
97 ms
__utm.gif
54 ms
v.gif
50 ms
204 ms
249 ms
11 ms
-P7NsxRFppnupVr6yhftQA.ttf
11 ms
h-YmANpv0wVrTiywvwSdPg.woff
11 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
xd_arbiter.php
137 ms
3 ms
livebrazen.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livebrazen.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
livebrazen.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livebrazen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livebrazen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livebrazen.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livebrazen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: