3.1 sec in total
513 ms
2.2 sec
388 ms
Visit livescorefeed.net now to see the best up-to-date Livescorefeed content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livescorefeed.net
LIVESCOREFEED - cheap live score sport xml data feeds
Visit livescorefeed.netWe analyzed Livescorefeed.net page load time and found that the first response time was 513 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
livescorefeed.net performance score
513 ms
245 ms
270 ms
277 ms
684 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Livescorefeed.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (907 ms) belongs to the original domain Livescorefeed.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (42%)
2.4 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Livescorefeed.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livescorefeed needs image optimization as it can save up to 132.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 560.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 560.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 301.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livescorefeed.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 301.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (32%)
34
23
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livescorefeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livescorefeed.net
513 ms
typography.css
245 ms
main.css
270 ms
media_queries.css
277 ms
jquery-2.1.0.min.js
684 ms
js.accordation.js
271 ms
parallax.js
550 ms
wowslider.js
526 ms
script.js
395 ms
EBURZceuQcw
172 ms
logo-livescorefeed.png
171 ms
pattern-bg01.png
770 ms
pattern-bg02.png
642 ms
img-icon23.png
151 ms
img-icon22.png
150 ms
img-icon24.png
136 ms
pattern-bg03.png
549 ms
logo-livescorefeed02.png
429 ms
pattern-bg05.png
815 ms
photo06.png
430 ms
img-icon29.png
450 ms
img-icon28.png
450 ms
img-icon31.png
580 ms
img-icon32.png
582 ms
img-icon33.png
662 ms
img-icon35.png
718 ms
img-icon36.png
716 ms
img-icon45.png
784 ms
filetto_regular.woff
816 ms
filetto_bold.woff
830 ms
filetto_extralight.woff
907 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
18 ms
www-embed-player.js
39 ms
base.js
90 ms
id
165 ms
YubHWiCUdycrt9r0pwxtCFMvWBBxMHmgtw0lFaZzSbY.js
168 ms
ad_status.js
159 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
109 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
108 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
106 ms
livescorefeed.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livescorefeed.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Livescorefeed.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livescorefeed.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livescorefeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: