Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 85% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

livet.se

Livet.se - ordspråk och konsulttjänster.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

769 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

livet.se screenshot

About Website

Visit livet.se now to see the best up-to-date Livet content for Sweden and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livet.se

Livet.se.

Visit livet.se

Key Findings

We analyzed Livet.se page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 894 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livet.se performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livet.se

456 ms

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

analytics.js

21 ms

lftbar_v2.png

106 ms

Livet_logo130.gif

204 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Livet.se, 25% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Livet.se.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.5 kB (47%)

Content Size

79.6 kB

After Optimization

42.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Livet.se main page is 79.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 58.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livet. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

livet.se accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

livet.se best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

livet.se SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    SV

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livet.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livet.se main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: