Tools & Wizards About Us
livezone.es screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

livezone.es

This domain was registered by Youdot.io

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

781 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

116 ms

livezone.es screenshot

About Website

Visit livezone.es now to see the best up-to-date Livezone content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livezone.es

Visit livezone.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Livezone.es page load time and found that the first response time was 781 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livezone.es performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.livezone.es

781 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

css

66 ms

genericons.css

266 ms

style.css

356 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Livezone.es, 28% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (781 ms) belongs to the original domain Livezone.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.4 kB (69%)

Content Size

257.5 kB

After Optimization

80.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livezone.es main page is 257.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livezone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 99.9 kB

  • Original 146.3 kB
  • After minification 143.6 kB
  • After compression 46.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

  • Original 96.7 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 26.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livezone.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livezone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.livezone.es

www.livezone.es

781 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

css

css

66 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

266 ms

style.css

style.css

356 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

449 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

184 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

185 ms

functions.js

functions.js

269 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

273 ms

66e6271447deb27fb23204e779363d5b

66e6271447deb27fb23204e779363d5b

60 ms

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4ENqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4ENqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

60 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nqp5NA6AAOjfQM_HmvD0shQ.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nqp5NA6AAOjfQM_HmvD0shQ.ttf

73 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngvr42gIYPGl20Rgir8ypAU.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngvr42gIYPGl20Rgir8ypAU.ttf

93 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

96 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

96 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

357 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

1 ms

Accessibility Review

livezone.es accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

livezone.es best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

livezone.es SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livezone.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Livezone.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livezone.es

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livezone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: