Tools & Wizards About Us
ljads.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

ljads.com

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

524 ms

ljads.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ljads content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ljads.com

Approaching affiliate marketing with a new perspective, LJAds has been providing excellent customer service above and beyond most in the industry. LJAds has been positioning itself to become one of th...

Visit ljads.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ljads.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ljads.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ljads.com

104 ms

css

77 ms

css

86 ms

css

98 ms

bootstrap.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Ljads.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (221 ms) relates to the external source Maps.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 962.9 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

905.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ljads.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 749.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 59.8 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.1 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 654.3 kB
  • After minification 617.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ljads images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 523.5 kB

  • Original 749.7 kB
  • After minification 701.9 kB
  • After compression 226.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 523.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 342.8 kB

  • Original 393.7 kB
  • After minification 301.5 kB
  • After compression 50.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ljads.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 342.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (62%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ljads. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ljads.com

ljads.com

104 ms

css

css

77 ms

css

css

86 ms

css

css

98 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

22 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

animate.css

animate.css

41 ms

YTPlayer.css

YTPlayer.css

49 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

48 ms

cubeportfolio.css

cubeportfolio.css

59 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

46 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

45 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

home-animated.css

home-animated.css

67 ms

default.css

default.css

66 ms

logo.png

logo.png

59 ms

team-1_2.jpg

team-1_2.jpg

60 ms

team-3-2.jpg

team-3-2.jpg

62 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

62 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

62 ms

nprogress.js

nprogress.js

61 ms

NProgress-start.js

NProgress-start.js

61 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

61 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

58 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

60 ms

jquery.stellar.js

jquery.stellar.js

63 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

64 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

63 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

62 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

62 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

65 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

63 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

64 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

68 ms

jquery.reveal.js

jquery.reveal.js

67 ms

js

js

221 ms

Gmap.js

Gmap.js

67 ms

portfolio-main.js

portfolio-main.js

66 ms

customs.js

customs.js

66 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

67 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

56 ms

EasePack.min.js

EasePack.min.js

48 ms

rAF.js

rAF.js

46 ms

home-animated2.js

home-animated2.js

43 ms

switcher.js

switcher.js

41 ms

team-5-2.jpg

team-5-2.jpg

41 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

39 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

33 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

25 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

25 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

24 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

26 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

24 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

24 ms

99.jpg

99.jpg

24 ms

client_cursor.png

client_cursor.png

83 ms

bg_2.jpg

bg_2.jpg

36 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

13 ms

bg_3.jpg

bg_3.jpg

20 ms

bg_6.jpg

bg_6.jpg

34 ms

bg_5.jpg

bg_5.jpg

17 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

27 ms

common.js

common.js

20 ms

util.js

util.js

102 ms

marker.js

marker.js

103 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

80 ms

user-profile-close.png

user-profile-close.png

61 ms

plus-large.png

plus-large.png

37 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

Accessibility Review

ljads.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ljads.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ljads.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ljads.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ljads.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ljads.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ljads. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: