Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

llama.pe

Firma Digital con Certificado Digital Perú - Llama.pe

Page Load Speed

11.5 sec in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

3.3 sec

llama.pe screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Llama content for Peru. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about llama.pe

Llama.pe Firma Digital y Sello de Tiempo INDECOPI, proveedor de Certificado Digital para Factura Electrónica, documentos electrónicos PDF, Empresas, Persona Natural, Profesional, Agente automatizado, ...

Visit llama.pe

Key Findings

We analyzed Llama.pe page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

llama.pe performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,580 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.487

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

llama.pe

99 ms

llama.pe

6636 ms

application-68c722e4785a5486c83d12b06b5cd3587e866e6768856e5c76731749c0181987.js

42 ms

application-82bf038574fab06ab93125ce0a67ca7f13091b365452522c399ecfda8ce69e5a.css

119 ms

js

238 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Llama.pe, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Llama.pe.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 263.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

973.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Llama.pe main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 31.0 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 234.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 928.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Llama needs image optimization as it can save up to 234.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 37.8 kB
  • After minification 37.8 kB
  • After compression 37.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Llama.pe has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (12%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Llama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

llama.pe accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

llama.pe best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

llama.pe SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Llama.pe can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Llama.pe main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Llama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: