6.2 sec in total
2.2 sec
3.8 sec
191 ms
Welcome to lm.lt homepage info - get ready to check Lm best content for Lithuania right away, or after learning these important things about lm.lt
Visit lm.ltWe analyzed Lm.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lm.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
2214 ms
244 ms
239 ms
601 ms
479 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lm.lt, 4% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pr.prchecker.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lm.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 556.1 kB (59%)
948.2 kB
392.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lm.lt main page is 948.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 538.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 370.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 370.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lm.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 149.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (57%)
47
20
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lm.lt
2214 ms
A.widgetkit-adf3fcf5.css.pagespeed.cf.hw1iUrTGLN.css
244 ms
A.com_acymailing,,_css,,_module_default_basic_green.css,,qv==1455716005+coalawebtraffic,,_modules,,_traffic,,_css,,_cwt-base.css+coalawebtraffic,,_modules,,_traffic,,_counter-themes,,_tags,,_css,,_cw-visitors.css,Mcc.YbQrp9lcaw.css.pagespeed.cf.XmDjvNL_ub.css
239 ms
jquery.min.js.pagespeed.jm.iDyG3vc4gw.js
601 ms
media,_jui,_js,_jquery-noconflict.js+media,_jui,_js,_jquery-migrate.min.js+cache,_widgetkit,_widgetkit-ef832a0f.js+media,_jui,_js,_bootstrap.min.js+media,_com_acymailing,_js,_acymailing_module.js,qv==520.pagespeed.jc.-HfHMDBJa5.js
479 ms
A.base.css.pagespeed.cf.F4xFThKzr_.css
251 ms
A.layout.css.pagespeed.cf.rZBa_Bv6sz.css
249 ms
A.menus.css.pagespeed.cf.zZqlioxqMX.css
353 ms
A.modules.css.pagespeed.cf.keJjQF-FLg.css
361 ms
A.tools.css.pagespeed.cf.vUpOPhCugs.css
418 ms
system.css+extensions.css+custom.css+background,_bubbles_green.css+animations.css+color,_green.css+font2,_arial.css+font3,_arial.css+style.css.pagespeed.cc.wngQ2OlVKy.css
372 ms
warp,_js,_warp.js+warp,_js,_accordionmenu.js+warp,_js,_dropdownmenu.js+js,_template.js+warp,_js,_search.js.pagespeed.jc.nERv1M5LCy.js
471 ms
lightbox.js
252 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
405 ms
spotlight.js
179 ms
system.css
136 ms
system.css
127 ms
system-all.css
138 ms
getpr.php
103 ms
xtoolbar_bg.png.pagespeed.ic.R1Q2x205Z_.jpg
141 ms
xsearchbox.png.pagespeed.ic.JVwm4GGNtI.png
140 ms
xlitnet_logo_130.png.pagespeed.ic.yNpl1WL3pS.png
141 ms
xpastas_lm.png.pagespeed.ic.aW_Kk00mX0.png
260 ms
150x100xbanner_lm.jpg.pagespeed.ic.FA4xKNB0vm.jpg
215 ms
309x171xinterneto_savaite.PNG.pagespeed.ic.Qc9ddJh58T.png
609 ms
xktu_logo_40.png.pagespeed.ic.jkutHluDFa.png
258 ms
home_page.png.pagespeed.ce.z9ZRPlhEDX.png
251 ms
menu_dropdown_level1.png.pagespeed.ce.Jtjr1-xnsn.png
331 ms
xsitemap_color.png.pagespeed.ic.PWwViXfq36.png
361 ms
radial_gradient.svg
410 ms
module_line.png.pagespeed.ce.x4yc1ykcZu.png
374 ms
xnav.png.pagespeed.ic.PbJnc4Nt9y.png
393 ms
xmodule_icons.png.pagespeed.ic.OzbB9i1pY-.png
453 ms
xemail_at_sign.png.pagespeed.ic.vi9GyOtLX3.png
485 ms
all.js
40 ms
xmodule_stripes.png.pagespeed.ic.wEj2v-MDlP.png
475 ms
xtags.png.pagespeed.ic.lV5wpOJs7V.png
588 ms
list_icon.png
527 ms
list_line.png
553 ms
,
25 ms
slideshow.js
581 ms
totop_scroller.png.pagespeed.ce.AeurCXeCCj.png
580 ms
157 ms
xd_arbiter.php
31 ms
xd_arbiter.php
41 ms
sftp_150x100.png
268 ms
security_150x100.png
142 ms
jce_150x100.png
249 ms
j3_150x100.png
130 ms
lm.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lm.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lm.lt SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LT
LT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lm.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lm.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lm.lt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: