3 sec in total
315 ms
2.6 sec
172 ms
Welcome to lmreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Lm Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lmreview.com
Longevity Medicine Review provides comprehensive articles on longevity medicine, anti-aging, and complimentary medicine and life extension. Edited by Lara Pizzorno, the lmreview.com website is the fi...
Visit lmreview.comWe analyzed Lmreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lmreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value4.4 s
73/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.531
14/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
315 ms
32 ms
81 ms
107 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Lmreview.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lmreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 146.2 kB (24%)
610.7 kB
464.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lmreview.com main page is 610.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 469.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lm Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lmreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (38%)
48
30
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lm Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lmreview.com
315 ms
layout.css
32 ms
styles.css
81 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
107 ms
jquery.jfontsizer.min.js
57 ms
jquery.popup.js
875 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
1763 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
13 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
bg_content_shadow.png
41 ms
bg_top_shadow.png
45 ms
lmr_logo.png
46 ms
submit_button.png
57 ms
nav_bg.png
60 ms
nav_search_button.png
60 ms
hover_nav_bg.gif
60 ms
hover_nav_bg_right.gif
60 ms
nav_item_seperator.gif
59 ms
content_bg_col.png
115 ms
main_col_blue_header_bg.png
115 ms
home_slider_bg.png
176 ms
adrenal_cover2-116x177_2-410x301.gif
177 ms
transparent-bg.png
114 ms
5121342-410x301.jpg
215 ms
shutterstock_1447721-410x301.jpg
253 ms
shutterstock_20325178-410x301.jpg
228 ms
view-all-upcoming-events.png
175 ms
submit_article_box.png
176 ms
lara-75x102.jpg
180 ms
morgenthaler_9-75x88.jpg
180 ms
hfn_logo.png
192 ms
smart_pub_logo.png
202 ms
ca-pub-4110209899612644.js
86 ms
zrt_lookup.html
142 ms
show_ads_impl.js
85 ms
rss_icon.gif
171 ms
icon_twitter.png
186 ms
icon_facebook.png
195 ms
bg_bottom_shadow.png
196 ms
ga.js
24 ms
__utm.gif
71 ms
ads
208 ms
osd.js
10 ms
4132373776523598560
35 ms
abg.js
40 ms
m_js_controller.js
49 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
35 ms
s
21 ms
x_button_blue2.png
20 ms
lmreview.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lmreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lmreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lmreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lmreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lmreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lm Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: