Tools & Wizards About Us
loadimpact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

loadimpact.com

Load Impact is now k6

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

885 ms

Page Rendered

346 ms

loadimpact.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Load Impact content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loadimpact.com

Due to the k6 open source load testing tool's success and rapid growth, we decided to rebrand LoadImpact as k6.

Visit loadimpact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadimpact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadimpact.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadimpact.com

11 ms

loadimpact.com

66 ms

main.min.67e36b9d1859.css

109 ms

0d9f17cf925d.js

160 ms

se-v1.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Loadimpact.com, 40% (22 requests) were made to D3dfcx9bcohi6j.cloudfront.net and 18% (10 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) relates to the external source Jphd930v44rh.statuspage.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 503.6 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

690.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loadimpact.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 700.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 32.2 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 531 B

  • Original 250.4 kB
  • After minification 249.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Load Impact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 82.4 kB

  • Original 203.7 kB
  • After minification 203.7 kB
  • After compression 121.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.4 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 389.9 kB

  • Original 700.7 kB
  • After minification 700.6 kB
  • After compression 310.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadimpact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (36%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Load Impact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadimpact.com

loadimpact.com

11 ms

loadimpact.com

loadimpact.com

66 ms

main.min.67e36b9d1859.css

main.min.67e36b9d1859.css

109 ms

0d9f17cf925d.js

0d9f17cf925d.js

160 ms

se-v1.js

se-v1.js

86 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

64 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

320 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

29 ms

bg-img.05370e715d21.jpg

bg-img.05370e715d21.jpg

88 ms

sprite.c627284b917c.png

sprite.c627284b917c.png

41 ms

video.55b7c1fd4c01.png

video.55b7c1fd4c01.png

64 ms

logo-rackspace.306f71bb1c60.png

logo-rackspace.306f71bb1c60.png

67 ms

logo-salesforce.dffc1ae2d340.png

logo-salesforce.dffc1ae2d340.png

65 ms

logo-ibm.006003ba6f17.png

logo-ibm.006003ba6f17.png

65 ms

logo-servicenow.4d9ca62226d4.png

logo-servicenow.4d9ca62226d4.png

65 ms

logo-nasdaq.80805b62be60.png

logo-nasdaq.80805b62be60.png

87 ms

logo-jwt-small.12d66d7a97df.png

logo-jwt-small.12d66d7a97df.png

84 ms

use-case-automated-testing.ec441c15b4cb.jpg

use-case-automated-testing.ec441c15b4cb.jpg

89 ms

use-case-api-testing.9bdbabd18164.jpg

use-case-api-testing.9bdbabd18164.jpg

84 ms

use-case-web-app-testing.57421a897cbe.jpg

use-case-web-app-testing.57421a897cbe.jpg

84 ms

use-case-mobile-testing.dccecf63dfe7.jpg

use-case-mobile-testing.dccecf63dfe7.jpg

141 ms

logo-internetworld.6df6d554925b.png

logo-internetworld.6df6d554925b.png

136 ms

logo-mashable.d01ba956c08b.png

logo-mashable.d01ba956c08b.png

136 ms

logo-sdtimes.a63dde039d75.png

logo-sdtimes.a63dde039d75.png

141 ms

logo-infoq.2417bcbf70ee.png

logo-infoq.2417bcbf70ee.png

158 ms

logo-programmableweb.112c76efdb11.png

logo-programmableweb.112c76efdb11.png

157 ms

logo-dzone.32c854151e1f.png

logo-dzone.32c854151e1f.png

171 ms

facebook-share.66ffb79572b5.png

facebook-share.66ffb79572b5.png

171 ms

23 ms

m+IXZypHJw==

m+IXZypHJw==

23 ms

v0rCfT76b4CXfARys=

v0rCfT76b4CXfARys=

23 ms

79KzH0++m+Al3qEcr

79KzH0++m+Al3qEcr

23 ms

5hdlGUJXC5rJ0P09gsUDTYS8tPkVlKRqRudda4Xjohw4uThPHitOmxrPr31a68n0uyl+AYg+Ry8=

5hdlGUJXC5rJ0P09gsUDTYS8tPkVlKRqRudda4Xjohw4uThPHitOmxrPr31a68n0uyl+AYg+Ry8=

23 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

156 ms

WBApetuSwzPWmnSb7ViA.js

WBApetuSwzPWmnSb7ViA.js

141 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

155 ms

1681264.js

1681264.js

321 ms

status.json

status.json

426 ms

statistics

statistics

132 ms

5hdlGUJXC5rJ0P09gsUDTYS8tPkVlKRqRudda4Xjohw4uThPHitOmxrPr31a68n0uyl+AYg+Ry8=

5hdlGUJXC5rJ0P09gsUDTYS8tPkVlKRqRudda4Xjohw4uThPHitOmxrPr31a68n0uyl+AYg+Ry8=

4 ms

79KzH0++m+Al3qEcr

79KzH0++m+Al3qEcr

4 ms

v0rCfT76b4CXfARys=

v0rCfT76b4CXfARys=

4 ms

KMsZdLWgmQzd3yNYPNBEyEubX0FJqmZ03rVWOC7KgZOL8vix4rSp8fzap7UeT7+b4hdnKkcn

KMsZdLWgmQzd3yNYPNBEyEubX0FJqmZ03rVWOC7KgZOL8vix4rSp8fzap7UeT7+b4hdnKkcn

3 ms

3 ms

84 ms

ecommerce.js

ecommerce.js

29 ms

31 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

17 ms

102 ms

track.js

track.js

172 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

27 ms

__ptq.gif

__ptq.gif

80 ms

3IJKSUGBWZFK7N2ZFNV3O6.js

3IJKSUGBWZFK7N2ZFNV3O6.js

123 ms

Accessibility Review

loadimpact.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

loadimpact.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

loadimpact.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadimpact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadimpact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadimpact.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Load Impact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: