4.7 sec in total
737 ms
2.8 sec
1.2 sec
Visit lobopedia.es now to see the best up-to-date LOBOPEDIA content for Dominican Republic and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lobopedia.es
Visit lobopedia.esWe analyzed Lobopedia.es page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lobopedia.es rating and web reputation
lobopedia.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value6,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
737 ms
258 ms
174 ms
172 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Lobopedia.es, 11% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lobopedia.es.
Page size can be reduced by 345.9 kB (39%)
885.1 kB
539.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lobopedia.es main page is 885.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 393.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LOBOPEDIA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 224.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lobopedia.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)
80
34
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LOBOPEDIA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lobopedia.es
737 ms
style.css
258 ms
wpProQuiz_front.min.css
174 ms
wbounce.css
172 ms
style.css
172 ms
jquery.js
432 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
246 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
86 ms
comment-reply.min.js
90 ms
wbounce-ck.js
90 ms
script_no_follow.js
88 ms
googleplus.js.php
85 ms
plusone.js
57 ms
widgets.js
5 ms
main.js
124 ms
style.css
89 ms
style.css
89 ms
gpt.js
59 ms
banner.jpg
460 ms
leather_5.gif
458 ms
cropped-cabecera2.jpg
849 ms
header.jpg
399 ms
Animals-Wolves_Morning-Jog-Wolves.jpg
1075 ms
Animals-Cool-Creatures_Running-with-the-Pack-Wolves.jpg
898 ms
compartenos.jpg
898 ms
email.png
456 ms
lobo-test.jpg
618 ms
ayuda.jpg
1079 ms
ayudar-animales.jpg
805 ms
ca-pub-6687367180439499.js
186 ms
zrt_lookup.html
263 ms
show_ads_impl.js
106 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
167 ms
like.php
316 ms
like.php
389 ms
ads
240 ms
wordpress.png
624 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
217 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
259 ms
fastbutton
371 ms
fastbutton
535 ms
frontend.css
634 ms
default.css
636 ms
clear.css
692 ms
icegram.js
765 ms
osd.js
82 ms
container.html
54 ms
ads
223 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
197 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
193 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
189 ms
ads
335 ms
ads
352 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
301 ms
ads
330 ms
postmessageRelay
326 ms
ads
284 ms
abg.js
252 ms
rs=AGLTcCMjK4CJMIdNJ3yzirfRYfXhXxdyVw
111 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
145 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
139 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
248 ms
000000_new_ico.gif
20 ms
api.js
88 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
207 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
199 ms
6486ee8831ec61a50a12d1798da21d2e_1.html
162 ms
6486ee8831ec61a50a12d1798da21d2e_1.html
154 ms
ga.js
125 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
50 ms
main.js
128 ms
st.v2.js
72 ms
__utm.gif
108 ms
__utm.gif
100 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.es.html
96 ms
4f65c37d23a53433a8172d800e75c3fb.jpg
91 ms
cvo.gif
108 ms
gr
119 ms
phone_style.css
121 ms
pixel_details.html
3 ms
activeview
14 ms
activeview
15 ms
jot.html
1 ms
lobopedia.es accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lobopedia.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lobopedia.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lobopedia.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lobopedia.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lobopedia.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LOBOPEDIA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: