Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

logosapostolic.org

LOGOS APOSTOLIC CHURCH of GOD and BIBLE COLLEGE

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

570 ms

Page Rendered

329 ms

logosapostolic.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to logosapostolic.org homepage info - get ready to check LOGOS APOSTOLIC best content for Singapore right away, or after learning these important things about logosapostolic.org

Logos Apostolic Church of God and Bible college website for true apostolic bible study.

Visit logosapostolic.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Logosapostolic.org page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 899 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

logosapostolic.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

logosapostolic.org

199 ms

www.logosapostolic.org

170 ms

ga.js

63 ms

bg1.jpg

143 ms

flags.jpg

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Logosapostolic.org, 17% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (200 ms) belongs to the original domain Logosapostolic.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.7 kB (46%)

Content Size

75.8 kB

After Optimization

41.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Logosapostolic.org main page is 75.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 40.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LOGOS APOSTOLIC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 40.9 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LOGOS APOSTOLIC. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

logosapostolic.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

logosapostolic.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

logosapostolic.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logosapostolic.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Logosapostolic.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LOGOS APOSTOLIC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: