Tools & Wizards About Us
lola.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lola.com

Lola Dating

Page Load Speed

859 ms in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

737 ms

Page Rendered

86 ms

lola.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lola.com now to see the best up-to-date Lola content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lola.com

The dating app for actually going on dates!

Visit lola.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lola.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 823 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lola.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lola.com

36 ms

lola.com

27 ms

www.lola.com

92 ms

font_graphic.css

48 ms

font_icomoon.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lola.com, 63% (19 requests) were made to D31r9j1pxp00yb.cloudfront.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (269 ms) relates to the external source D31r9j1pxp00yb.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.6 kB (36%)

Content Size

217.9 kB

After Optimization

140.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lola.com main page is 217.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 126.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 17.8 kB

  • Original 26.8 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 64.8 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lola images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 126.3 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 70.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lola.com

lola.com

36 ms

lola.com

lola.com

27 ms

www.lola.com

www.lola.com

92 ms

font_graphic.css

font_graphic.css

48 ms

font_icomoon.css

font_icomoon.css

66 ms

main.css

main.css

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

browser-polyfill.min.js

browser-polyfill.min.js

35 ms

app.js

app.js

58 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

66 ms

lolascope-animated.gif

lolascope-animated.gif

39 ms

lolascope-animated.gif

lolascope-animated.gif

36 ms

lolascope-animated-placeholder.png

lolascope-animated-placeholder.png

37 ms

iphone6s_white.png

iphone6s_white.png

35 ms

home_screen.png

home_screen.png

39 ms

Graphik-Regular-Web.woff

Graphik-Regular-Web.woff

46 ms

Graphik-Medium-Web.woff

Graphik-Medium-Web.woff

51 ms

Graphik-Light-Web.woff

Graphik-Light-Web.woff

41 ms

Graphik-Extralight-Web.woff

Graphik-Extralight-Web.woff

38 ms

Graphik-Thin-Web.woff

Graphik-Thin-Web.woff

269 ms

Graphik-Semibold-Web.woff

Graphik-Semibold-Web.woff

87 ms

Graphik-Bold-Web.woff

Graphik-Bold-Web.woff

51 ms

Graphik-Black-Web.woff

Graphik-Black-Web.woff

75 ms

Graphik-Super-Web.woff

Graphik-Super-Web.woff

74 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

21 ms

nr-1044.min.js

nr-1044.min.js

12 ms

y8kn6ie7

y8kn6ie7

49 ms

88fc1fb08e

88fc1fb08e

95 ms

shim.4a5a3d93.js

shim.4a5a3d93.js

134 ms

SEO Factors

lola.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lola.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lola.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lola.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lola. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: