2.1 sec in total
279 ms
1.5 sec
349 ms
Visit loonwatch.com now to see the best up-to-date Loonwatch content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about loonwatch.com
Keeping an eye on the web\'s most notorious anti-Muslim demagogues
Visit loonwatch.comWe analyzed Loonwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
loonwatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
279 ms
187 ms
269 ms
148 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Loonwatch.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) belongs to the original domain Loonwatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 374.1 kB (33%)
1.1 MB
766.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Loonwatch.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 655.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loonwatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 123.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loonwatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (42%)
57
33
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loonwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.loonwatch.com
279 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
187 ms
style.css
269 ms
layout.css
148 ms
jetpack.css
281 ms
jquery.js
412 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
177 ms
third-party.js
230 ms
modernizr.js
251 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
254 ms
general.js
296 ms
shortcodes.css
323 ms
custom.css
313 ms
comment-reply.min.js
238 ms
photon.js
239 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
58 ms
gprofiles.js
54 ms
wpgroho.js
255 ms
wp-embed.min.js
299 ms
e-201608.js
4 ms
1624183_10151851342121065_857268310_n.jpg
292 ms
screen_shot_2016-02-17_at_3.07.21_pm-e1455906983629.png
29 ms
Darren_Wilson-e1455301871101.jpg
26 ms
Pegida_Islamophobia_Coalition-e1452627561981.jpeg
26 ms
Refugee-centre-attack3.jpg
287 ms
10414594_10153797896033209_7985125261906340012_n-800x430.jpg
77 ms
bed22b2e7a7f649f44abdb8e941dfaa4
73 ms
68ee80b97930b9523e8d8ae0bd3fa659
74 ms
d714cca406169b8dbd704d1c4055e877
73 ms
26f55c87ce2433cdaa6d2677f1dcaec1
86 ms
Sandow_Birk-100x100.jpg
10 ms
dude_watching_fox-e1453501676898.jpg
14 ms
Al-Shabab-100x100.jpg
10 ms
Arun_Kundnani_CNN_Trump_Republican-100x100.jpg
10 ms
Daily_Show_Dalia_Mogahed_Trevor_Noah-100x100.jpg
11 ms
make-america-white-again-e1450286667424-100x100.jpg
61 ms
screen_shot_2016-02-17_at_3.07.21_pm-e1455906983629-45x45.png
12 ms
79f20d3c48d0cd8e138d29c2b68b0182
84 ms
Ziad_Abu_Naim_Lisa-e1452895148226.jpg
61 ms
Islamic_Center_Omaha-100x100.jpg
54 ms
NYPD_Surveillance-100x100.jpg
56 ms
White_Flight_Suburban_Mosques-e1451148155798-100x100.jpg
62 ms
Aladdin-100x100.jpg
55 ms
ParisAntiIslaophobiaRally11-12-15a-4-100x100.jpg
58 ms
Latino_Solidarity-100x100.jpg
58 ms
Darren_Wilson-e1455301871101-45x45.jpg
59 ms
sdk.js
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
293 ms
count.js
195 ms
widgets.js
194 ms
hovercard.css
32 ms
services.css
66 ms
g.gif
7 ms
count-data.js
64 ms
count-data.js
90 ms
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
52 ms
xd_arbiter.php
81 ms
loonwatch.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
loonwatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
loonwatch.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loonwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loonwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
loonwatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Loonwatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: