3.5 sec in total
765 ms
2.5 sec
226 ms
Click here to check amazing Loring content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loring.com
Loring commercial coffee roasters are designed and built in the USA. Unmatched quality, unheard-of efficiency, and unparalleled control.
Visit loring.comWe analyzed Loring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 765 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Loring.com rating and web reputation
loring.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
765 ms
138 ms
133 ms
131 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Loring.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to J.clickdensity.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Loring.com.
Page size can be reduced by 376.2 kB (45%)
841.0 kB
464.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Loring.com main page is 841.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 386.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 271.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (64%)
69
25
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
loring.com
765 ms
system.base.css
138 ms
system.menus.css
133 ms
system.messages.css
131 ms
system.theme.css
133 ms
book.css
133 ms
comment.css
173 ms
date.css
252 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
258 ms
field.css
259 ms
node.css
253 ms
search.css
252 ms
user.css
294 ms
views.css
375 ms
ckeditor.css
375 ms
ctools.css
377 ms
html-reset.css
378 ms
wireframes.css
379 ms
layout-fixed.css
415 ms
page-backgrounds.css
505 ms
tabs.css
497 ms
pages.css
560 ms
blocks.css
503 ms
navigation.css
504 ms
views-styles.css
538 ms
nodes.css
621 ms
comments.css
630 ms
forms.css
631 ms
fields.css
627 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
660 ms
print.css
681 ms
small.css
743 ms
small2.css
750 ms
modernizr.min.js
754 ms
jquery.min.js
934 ms
jquery.once.js
781 ms
cr.js
180 ms
drupal.js
772 ms
admin_devel.js
749 ms
googleanalytics.js
757 ms
script.js
839 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1095 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
811 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
832 ms
jquery.cookie.js
757 ms
customScrollBarMobile.js
815 ms
js_injector_1.js
816 ms
home-bg.jpg
568 ms
ga.js
6 ms
about-us-on.png
157 ms
contact-us-on.png
165 ms
login-on.png
222 ms
roasters-on.png
226 ms
testimonials-on.png
284 ms
why-loring-on.png
305 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
header-bar.png
68 ms
black-80.png
71 ms
logo.png
186 ms
white-80.png
127 ms
scrollbar.png
138 ms
footer-bar.png
190 ms
factory-financing.png
261 ms
testimonialsbox.png
272 ms
calculator.png
373 ms
gg.png
262 ms
fb.png
309 ms
in.png
318 ms
twt.png
387 ms
pin.png
387 ms
gothamcondensed-book-webfont.woff
435 ms
winterthurcondensed-webfont.woff
474 ms
trajanpro-regular-webfont.woff
519 ms
__utm.gif
7 ms
loring.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
loring.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
loring.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
loring.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: