2.5 sec in total
413 ms
1.9 sec
224 ms
Welcome to lovemarkers.com homepage info - get ready to check Love Markers best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lovemarkers.com
Bronze & Granite Cemetery Grave Markers, Shipped Free Throughout The US. Visit The Website For Custom Flat Marker Designs and Call Love Markers Today.
Visit lovemarkers.comWe analyzed Lovemarkers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 413 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lovemarkers.com rating and web reputation
lovemarkers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value1,820 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.654
8/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
413 ms
233 ms
137 ms
220 ms
463 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lovemarkers.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lovemarkers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.0 kB (15%)
3.3 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Lovemarkers.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 211.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love Markers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovemarkers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (12%)
49
43
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love Markers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lovemarkers.com
413 ms
style.css
233 ms
skdslider.css
137 ms
responsive.css
220 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
463 ms
skdslider.min.js
175 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
354 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
swap.js
12 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
body_bg.png
394 ms
logo.png
280 ms
bullet.png
279 ms
list_nav.jpg
279 ms
nav_bg.jpg
280 ms
SingleVaseHomePg.jpg
761 ms
custombronze_homepg.jpg
964 ms
veteran_homepg.jpg
689 ms
companionvase_homepg.jpg
710 ms
custommarker_homepg.jpg
609 ms
8de541c1cc9b48ea96c8ef6a467c0b49.jpg
495 ms
b730a83e932e431da1e3ee9b69753fe2.jpg
595 ms
58fcbc426d9e4faa877a52d0219e06f2.jpg
664 ms
96569ac96fe64237adf521f156958b31.jpg
716 ms
blockimg2.jpg
749 ms
Dean%20Marker%20Installeds.jpg
803 ms
Cantey%20Marker%20sm.jpg
793 ms
Beydler%20Marker%20Installed.jpg
995 ms
Peck%20Testimonial.jpg
906 ms
Lammers-Monas-handprint.JPG
952 ms
Lammers-Jerry-Lammers.JPG
940 ms
Trowbridgesite043.jpg
902 ms
Will%20Shade%20Testimonial.jpg
1006 ms
Miller%20226x151.jpg
1061 ms
phone.png
1025 ms
cards.png
1026 ms
cards2.png
1042 ms
thumb_boxes_title.jpg
1091 ms
small_box_title.jpg
1099 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
10 ms
view_more_btn.png
1069 ms
collect
7 ms
border.png
1056 ms
border2.png
1064 ms
225 ms
collect
192 ms
collect
248 ms
swap_session.js
326 ms
slider_pager_bg.png
887 ms
left.png
920 ms
right.png
930 ms
slider_connent_bg.png
924 ms
43 ms
lovemarkers.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lovemarkers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lovemarkers.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovemarkers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lovemarkers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lovemarkers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Love Markers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: