Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

lovestoryblog.com

lovestoryblog.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

727 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

187 ms

lovestoryblog.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lovestoryblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Lovestoryblog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lovestoryblog.com

Visit lovestoryblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovestoryblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 727 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovestoryblog.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovestoryblog.com

727 ms

px.js

43 ms

px.js

78 ms

min.js

152 ms

bg.gif

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lovestoryblog.com, 37% (7 requests) were made to Dt.spamanalyst.com and 16% (3 requests) were made to I1.cdn-image.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (727 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovestoryblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.5 kB (67%)

Content Size

42.8 kB

After Optimization

14.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Lovestoryblog.com main page is 42.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 29.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 284 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovestoryblog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovestoryblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lovestoryblog.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

lovestoryblog.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lovestoryblog.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovestoryblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lovestoryblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovestoryblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: