1.7 sec in total
37 ms
1.3 sec
378 ms
Welcome to ltgtr.in homepage info - get ready to check Ltgtr best content right away, or after learning these important things about ltgtr.in
Visit ltgtr.inWe analyzed Ltgtr.in page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
ltgtr.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
37 ms
165 ms
25 ms
62 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ltgtr.in, 19% (20 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (361 ms) relates to the external source 4.bp.blogspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 107.5 kB (12%)
883.0 kB
775.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ltgtr.in main page is 883.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 637.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ltgtr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltgtr.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 56% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (55%)
97
44
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ltgtr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ltgtr.in
37 ms
www.ltgtr.in
165 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
25 ms
3645911276-widget_css_bundle.css
62 ms
authorization.css
112 ms
plusone.js
89 ms
excerpt.js
33 ms
all.js
12 ms
plusone.js
32 ms
related-posts-with-thumbnails-for-blogger-pro.js
46 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
12 ms
ga.js
77 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
66 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
66 ms
google_top_exp.js
66 ms
gtm.js
144 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
64 ms
header1920.jpg
151 ms
cse.js
61 ms
arrow_right.png
146 ms
ltgtr_jan_13_latest_issue.jpg
134 ms
ppt_bjp_aap_congress.jpg
133 ms
39368_S_Kejriwal_Dikshit-L.jpg
131 ms
blogger-widgets.png
132 ms
t0rqxt.jpg
194 ms
friendconnect.js
87 ms
Eklavya_ltgtr_2.jpg
196 ms
be_safe.jpg
309 ms
blogger-templates.png
95 ms
hl-dot.gif
96 ms
dreams.jpg
106 ms
candle-light-dinner.jpg
118 ms
stories_importance.jpg
197 ms
funny_ad.jpg
356 ms
food_love+(1).jpg
104 ms
Teach_For_India.jpg
283 ms
Read+More+Orange+Button.png
361 ms
confront+your+fears.jpg
104 ms
Eklavya_ltgtr.jpg
305 ms
cse.js
182 ms
__utm.gif
64 ms
navbar.g
114 ms
blank.html
22 ms
border.jpg
16 ms
ifr
244 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_3
37 ms
badge
109 ms
icons_peach.png
81 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
60 ms
arrows-light.png
102 ms
354 ms
jsapi
189 ms
postmessageRelay
271 ms
xd_arbiter.php
104 ms
xd_arbiter.php
254 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
47 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
45 ms
fastbutton
137 ms
rs=AGLTcCOSTChDV9ofgB0zcaQ1UiJs-kucfA
93 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
112 ms
rs=AGLTcCPw4t5G838cxsUW0XRDSJwZ5qD0_w
134 ms
postmessageRelay
187 ms
ifr
136 ms
like_box.php
282 ms
photo.jpg
165 ms
gplus-dd4b38-20.png
228 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
128 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
128 ms
rs=AGLTcCPw4t5G838cxsUW0XRDSJwZ5qD0_w
54 ms
default+en.css
56 ms
default+en.I.js
143 ms
google.blog.js
46 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
111 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
59 ms
rs=AGLTcCPw4t5G838cxsUW0XRDSJwZ5qD0_w
42 ms
default.css
67 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
E3TzvQNU166.css
98 ms
Q-OWgaJvbhn.css
108 ms
1kPfZUdGrka.js
124 ms
Yuj_Y8xNH2C.js
159 ms
Mpe38fuBVZ2.js
175 ms
n8qIhCw3vMx.js
173 ms
async-ads.js
43 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
39 ms
small-logo.png
37 ms
search_box_icon.png
38 ms
clear.png
36 ms
nav_logo114.png
39 ms
summary
178 ms
9352_657565044273169_1504362086_n.jpg
101 ms
379881_670866189609721_511421621_n.jpg
61 ms
10271505_561634267282669_1999318857544366562_n.jpg
71 ms
12294738_10206729210740447_424535680040621519_n.jpg
63 ms
12718046_10206172834022950_8881178342935576453_n.jpg
57 ms
935393_598972506782494_1453502525_n.jpg
58 ms
10347066_602611476515287_5029113785695204296_n.jpg
61 ms
549356_989301714453209_2630192680265594386_n.jpg
60 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
55 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
54 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
7 ms
AmlxWlqMvlv.js
6 ms
ltgtr.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ltgtr.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
ltgtr.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltgtr.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ltgtr.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ltgtr.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ltgtr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: