Tools & Wizards About Us
lucia.moe screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

lucia.moe

Lucia's Cipher

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

211 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

234 ms

lucia.moe screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lucia content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lucia.moe

Lucia's Cipher Design and Development firm. We focus on security and style in both our open source projects and private comissions.

Visit lucia.moe

Key Findings

We analyzed Lucia.moe page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lucia.moe performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lucia.moe

211 ms

luciascipher.com

398 ms

chunk-vendors.5ec3c31d.css

260 ms

app.873ebb8a.css

246 ms

chunk-vendors.9a8c4657.js

624 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lucia.moe, 71% (5 requests) were made to Luciascipher.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) relates to the external source Luciascipher.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 325.9 kB (85%)

Content Size

383.1 kB

After Optimization

57.2 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lucia.moe main page is 383.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 380.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 807 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 324.3 kB

  • Original 380.7 kB
  • After minification 380.7 kB
  • After compression 56.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lucia.moe needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 324.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lucia. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

lucia.moe

lucia.moe

211 ms

luciascipher.com

luciascipher.com

398 ms

chunk-vendors.5ec3c31d.css

chunk-vendors.5ec3c31d.css

260 ms

app.873ebb8a.css

app.873ebb8a.css

246 ms

chunk-vendors.9a8c4657.js

chunk-vendors.9a8c4657.js

624 ms

app.b00074b7.js

app.b00074b7.js

403 ms

css

css

102 ms

Accessibility Review

lucia.moe accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lucia.moe best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lucia.moe SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lucia.moe can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lucia.moe main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lucia.moe

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lucia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: